Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Serial ATA Generation III 6.0Gb/s, SATA road map in mid 2007
|
TScinbao
|
Oct 25 2007, 08:26 PM, updated 19y ago
|
|
http://coffeenix.net/doc/hardware/sata_roadmap.gifSource : http://www.tek.com/Measurement/application..._data/sata.htmlMaybe SATA III is delay to be released, for those who plan to get 500GB SATA II HDD, I think is the right time? Since the 500GB HDD Samsung SATA II is selling at RM400 right now from forumer. The connector & cable maybe upgrade, means won't campatible with recent SATA port OR maybe need a converter ! 500GB HDD with 3.0Gb/s is too slow when transfer the whole capacity to backup. Should this prefer to wait for SATA III with 6.0Gb/s transfer rate ? Or who can tell us to know when was the SATA III gonna released ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
AceCombat
|
Oct 25 2007, 08:35 PM
|
|
i thought Seagate already announed SATA III for Barracuda series long time ago?
|
|
|
|
|
|
0168257061
|
Oct 25 2007, 09:10 PM
|
|
wah....I havn't use SATAII then SATAIII is coming...WTF >.<
|
|
|
|
|
|
empire23
|
Oct 25 2007, 09:14 PM
|
Team Island Hopper
|
Useless to you and me if you ask me.
Not that any HDDs can even take advantage of SATA1's transfer rates in the first place
|
|
|
|
|
|
ffrulz
|
Oct 25 2007, 09:19 PM
|
|
Slow because of S-ATA II? LOL! I have yet to see HDDs with a Read and Write speed of a constant 150MB/s. HDDs are becoming outdated soon, SSDs are taking over.
This post has been edited by ffrulz: Oct 25 2007, 09:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher_LKL
|
Oct 25 2007, 09:24 PM
|
|
our usual harddisk usually peak out of usual 80MB/s the most, so we aint even getting the usual speed of SATA 1.5gb/s, let alone SATA 2 which is 3gb/s... 6gb/s is wayyyyyy tooooooooo farrrrrrrrr .......
|
|
|
|
|
|
zeustronic
|
Oct 25 2007, 09:27 PM
|
|
of coz SCSI HDD should make the diffrence, but not SATA, SATAII unless ur having the 10K rpm 1s
This post has been edited by zeustronic: Oct 25 2007, 09:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
TScinbao
|
Oct 26 2007, 12:10 AM
|
|
QUOTE(ffrulz @ Oct 25 2007, 09:19 PM) Slow because of S-ATA II? LOL! I have yet to see HDDs with a Read and Write speed of a constant 150MB/s. HDDs are becoming outdated soon, SSDs are taking over. Do u means WD Raptor ? That SCSI 15k rpm SATA with 36 / 74 / 150 GB can cost u RM3XX - RM1k++. Which can't afford by entry level users, for 'HOME USER', 500GB HDD with SATA II 3.0Gb/s is that consider efficiency? This post has been edited by cinbao: Oct 26 2007, 12:11 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ffenixz
|
Oct 26 2007, 07:13 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(cinbao @ Oct 26 2007, 12:10 AM) QUOTE(ffrulz @ Oct 25 2007, 09:19 PM) Slow because of S-ATA II? LOL! I have yet to see HDDs with a Read and Write speed of a constant 150MB/s. HDDs are becoming outdated soon, SSDs are taking over. Do u means WD Raptor ? That SCSI 15k rpm SATA with 36 / 74 / 150 GB can cost u RM3XX - RM1k++. Which can't afford by entry level users, for 'HOME USER', 500GB HDD with SATA II 3.0Gb/s is that consider efficiency? No. Raptors are not SSDs (and for your info Raptor is only 10k RPM). SSD is an abbreviation of Solid-State Drive. Look, it doesn't matter if the 500GB HDD is using SATA, SATA II or even SATA III. The bottleneck here is not at the connections a.k.a. buses, it is at the HDD itself (the read and write time of the HDD). So even if you are using a 500GB SATA III HDD, it still doesn't fare any better than it does with SATA II or even SATA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ianho
|
Oct 26 2007, 08:52 AM
|
Cucimangkoklife
|
Even the fastest consumer HDD like the Raptor150 that I'm using now is on SATA1 only. There's no need for even SATA2. SATA2 n SATA3 is like having a super expressway but then u drive a Kancil on it at 80kmh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ozgamerz
|
Oct 26 2007, 09:00 AM
|
Getting Started

|
I think HDD is the bottle neck when the app is getting humongous and even with the latest CPU and RAM, it'll still slow to a certain point. Unless, everything runs at it's recommended limit, then it's going to be good
|
|
|
|
|
|
8tvt
|
Oct 26 2007, 10:09 AM
|
|
better la.. atleast sata I n II can drop price..
|
|
|
|
|
|
fiqir
|
Oct 26 2007, 11:01 AM
|
|
i still using old PATA interface
|
|
|
|
|
|
zeustronic
|
Oct 26 2007, 07:06 PM
|
|
QUOTE(8tvt @ Oct 26 2007, 11:09 AM) better la.. atleast sata I n II can drop price.. Actually supersit the older 1s, usually the make backward compatible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gundamseedw
|
Oct 27 2007, 12:38 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(AceCombat @ Oct 25 2007, 08:35 PM) i thought Seagate already announed SATA III for Barracuda series long time ago? SATA-III Not yet comes out ...... it's the shop calling SATA 3 meaning SATA 3Gbps not really SATA-III, 3rd generation. It's SATA-II, 2nd generation with 3 Gbps transfer rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CrossFirE
|
Oct 27 2007, 12:25 PM
|
|
hmm.. if SATA 3 is coming out, that means need new motherboard to support their new cable and new Graphic card also for PCI-E 2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
gundamseedw
|
Oct 27 2007, 03:46 PM
|
Getting Started

|
ya everything new and intel is gonna change their socket too
|
|
|
|
|
|
TScinbao
|
Oct 29 2007, 10:24 AM
|
|
Getting a Hitachi 400GB T7K400 (with S-ATA II 3.0Gb/s , NCQ) - RM315 Hitachi 320GB (with S-ATA II 3.0Gb/s , NCQ) T7K320 - RM265 WD 500GB (S-ATA II 3.0Gb/s) - RM380 Samsung 500GB (S-ATA II 3.0Gb/s) - RM360 Seagate 320GB (S-ATA II 3.0Gb/s, NCQ) - RM230 Seagate 500GB (S-ATA II 3.0Gb/s, NCQ) - =<RM500? That the Dilemma have to face, getting the Hitachi 400GB with RM315, is this godsend price ? The HDD performance thread from ianho was usefullness, that the link : http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/351064
|
|
|
|
|