Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Serial ATA Generation III 6.0Gb/s, SATA road map in mid 2007
|
TScinbao
|
 Oct 25 2007, 08:26 PM, updated 19y ago
|
|
http://coffeenix.net/doc/hardware/sata_roadmap.gifSource : http://www.tek.com/Measurement/application..._data/sata.htmlMaybe SATA III is delay to be released, for those who plan to get 500GB SATA II HDD, I think is the right time? Since the 500GB HDD Samsung SATA II is selling at RM400 right now from forumer. The connector & cable maybe upgrade, means won't campatible with recent SATA port OR maybe need a converter !  500GB HDD with 3.0Gb/s is too slow when transfer the whole capacity to backup. Should this prefer to wait for SATA III with 6.0Gb/s transfer rate ? Or who can tell us to know when was the SATA III gonna released ?  |
|
|
|
|
|
TScinbao
|
Oct 26 2007, 12:10 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(ffrulz @ Oct 25 2007, 09:19 PM) Slow because of S-ATA II? LOL! I have yet to see HDDs with a Read and Write speed of a constant 150MB/s. HDDs are becoming outdated soon, SSDs are taking over. Do u means WD Raptor ? That SCSI 15k rpm SATA with 36 / 74 / 150 GB can cost u RM3XX - RM1k++. Which can't afford by entry level users, for 'HOME USER', 500GB HDD with SATA II 3.0Gb/s is that consider efficiency? This post has been edited by cinbao: Oct 26 2007, 12:11 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
TScinbao
|
Oct 29 2007, 10:24 AM
|
|
|
Getting a Hitachi 400GB T7K400 (with S-ATA II 3.0Gb/s , NCQ) - RM315 Hitachi 320GB (with S-ATA II 3.0Gb/s , NCQ) T7K320 - RM265 WD 500GB (S-ATA II 3.0Gb/s) - RM380 Samsung 500GB (S-ATA II 3.0Gb/s) - RM360 Seagate 320GB (S-ATA II 3.0Gb/s, NCQ) - RM230 Seagate 500GB (S-ATA II 3.0Gb/s, NCQ) - =<RM500? That the Dilemma have to face, getting the Hitachi 400GB with RM315, is this godsend price ? The HDD performance thread from ianho was usefullness, that the link : http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/351064 |
|
|
|
|
|
TScinbao
|
Oct 29 2007, 10:49 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(cute_boboi @ Oct 29 2007, 10:44 AM) I guess the 6Gbps is only useful for short burst of data transfer (read/write), i.e. cannot sustain at that speed for >1 sec. And I think it is useful to apply in servers/SAN, e.g. 15k SAS with RAIDs config. I am agree with u the 6Gb/s was useful for huge data transfer as backup =<500GB data, if using IDE platform may take u an age.  Raid solution ? Hohoho, I am noob with RAID. Oh, Bro ikanayam, look like u gonna break the 10k posts records soon, congratz! |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0167sec
0.81
7 queries
GZIP Disabled