they just give 25 years,
they will 101 reason to void the warranty specially on the water side,
cause IP68 is not guarantee water cannot go in.
and no warranty on water protection.
the company also dunno still around after 10 to 15 years

Does Pathgreen replaced the micro up on the roof with skylift service included for 10 years, no labour or any other charges?

Oh, 6th year onwards chargeable? If need used skylift habis lo

To replace micro inverter don’t require sky lift la halo

Just got my bill :

August (TOU) : RM364
July (Non TOU: RM247

Usage for both and Solar generation almost the same.

I wonder if the bill is wrong? Any one can guide me thru and "My penjanaan in the bill is 0"

Weird

If they keep the current NEM deduction calculation, it is still feasible to go ToU for solar users coz technically they deduct the peak usage first regardless of when it is exported. During the holidays and weekends, usage is all in off peak rate (weekend day usage with multiple air-conds on hot day is pretty high for me).

However if they change to Peak Export can only be use for Peak Import and Off Peak export can only be use for Off Peak Import. Peak Export cannot be contra off for Off Peak Import that is initially rumoured (actually stated somewhere in TnB faq then), then ToU is not only not worth it, it might also be detrimental for NEM user to subscribe to ToU.

This is because most of our generation will likely be during Peak Period with peak usage contra off from direct solar generation. So with most of our solar generation exports accumulated during Peak Period, if cannot be use for off-peak usage where most household usage especially night air-cond users is in at night till morning, solar users will not only not benefit from ToU, it will be likely be a major loss where off peak import adds up with peak export sitting there and yet cannot contra them off. May as well stay with standard rates where all exports can be use for all imports.

So hopefully they keep to current calculation for NEM deduction aka deduct 100% Peak Import first then only follow by Off Peak Import deduction regardless of when it is exported.
However for my calculation in previous post, it will not be much but can still save up to 2 cups of starbuck in 1 year for me...haha.

But if they implemented the peak export can be use only for peak import, then I will be discontinuing ToU.

What is the problem then? When the time comes, changed back to normal NEM and pay the rm10 charge, you only need to click a button and upload ic in the website

Can lar...at least for now. The main reason I sign in so fast for ToU is because TnB ensure this ToU it can revert back to Standard Rate at any time.
Will lose RM10 stamping fee and probably 1 month of value difference.

If I did not do ToU, I would not know my actual Peak and Off Peak actual import usage. The ToU subscription showed me the actual pattern of my usage. Even if I switch back to standard, the point of view has done its job and gave me a peak of my usage pattern if based on ToU rather than always wondering if I do ToU, what will the total be like vs Standard Rate.

I already can see that without solar panel, due to my family members aka parent using air-cond during daytime, my peak usage is almost same with my off peak usage.
The solar direct usage absorb almost all the daytime usage with remaining half of my peak period usage coming from 6pm+ to 10pm, where we have dinner, mom switch on air-cond again.

With solar panel absorbing half of the peak usage, I can achieve 30:70 peak and off peak usage ratio that is beneficial when calculating using ToU.

So if import > export and peak usage > off peak usage, ToU for NEM is worthwhile over long term if TNB does not do any UTurn on current calculation.

What bee88 fear is just that, TnB doing uTurn down the line which is very very possible. Coz I read TnB faq about peak export can only be used for peak import and cannot be use for off peak import. Now they do this favourable to us 100% peak import deduction first regardless of when it was exported...

So TnB can sort of uTurn the current calculation at any time and revert to the original screwed FaQ one.

Anyway for now, I know for sure ToU does benefit me long term but be prepare to lose some money first aka RM10 stamping fee and the bloody full SST charges of my over 600 units of usage coz they cut off at 23 days for me and bill me full SST charges on ALL the units imported. The already earned on your first bill before switching to ToU...hehe.

So can do some magic to make the 100kW disappear!

Seems like the offset for ATAP is energy charges only. Not include capacity/network/retail charges unlike NEM.

Thx for sharing. Any specific brand ?

Not CCA.

CCA for solar is not Copper Cladded Aluminium! Helukabel is DCA. My house also used 4mm Hellukabel but if I know then would rather used 6mm Kuka CCA. From low to high fire resistance DCA, CCA, B2CA & B1CA.

Do we know what is the range for the "System Marginal Price"? Is it in use under NEM already or it will be new tariff under Solar ATAP?

System nowadays is much cheaper, 12.4kwp system around 45k EPP with 32kwh battery.  If cash term can negotiate for a few k more discount. This is enough for 1200kwh usage per month.

If ROI takes 10 years then don't think it is worth it. I tot gov is  promoting renewable energy that would help data centers & EV industries n reduce dependency  on electricity & petrol subsidies, mana tahu allow TNB to take one step back. Those smaller rooftop solar companies would have a hard time to sustain.

.
Most houseowners in Malaysia use most electricity at night, eg, cook dinner, wash clothes, watch TV, play computer, sleep in aircon rooms, charge EV car overnight, etc.

12kWp system = produces 1,200kWh per month = 40kWh per day but BESS/battery can only store 32kWh during daytime = about 6-7kWh would be exported to TNB during the day at RM0.21 per kWh under ATAP.

So, ROI is about 86 months or 7 years, not 75 months/6 years. Worth it.?
.