Unreal Tournament 3 Beta Demo, A New Way of Processor and GPU Benching?
|
|
 Oct 20 2007, 08:59 AM
|
 
Senior Member
1,262 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Butterworth, Penang  
|
Wow...the benchies already here. By the way, it seems UT is now very2 good on Intel Quad CPU.
As for me, i try running the game in 1920 X 1200 with default graphic setup. No lag but seems a bit slow in loading. Perhaps because of my CPU bottleneck. I believe AMD AM2 still good to go but not to the games highest graphic setup. |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 20 2007, 09:55 AM
|
Senior Member
4,251 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Malacca, Malaysia, Earth
|
QUOTE(khaidani @ Oct 20 2007, 08:27 AM) ok wat..u r like having a free spa..hehe Yes, good old memoriesanyway..i see that almost all unreal games are friendly with every gc available in market,from low end to high end..with playable framerate.. I remember last time i play unreal 2004 smoothly with geforce 2 reso 800*600,everything is low setting but still got some beautiful effect such as water reflection n etc.. so I do think this upcoming unreal also will be doing the same way..good thing to all unreal fan(no matter rich or poor  )   I played UT2003 on a GeForce 2 MX QUOTE(karom @ Oct 20 2007, 08:59 AM) Wow...the benchies already here. By the way, it seems UT is now very2 good on Intel Quad CPU. I don't think that has anything to do with CPU or RAM bottleneckAs for me, i try running the game in 1920 X 1200 with default graphic setup. No lag but seems a bit slow in loading. Perhaps because of my CPU bottleneck. I believe AMD AM2 still good to go but not to the games highest graphic setup. My games loading time for my old P4 DDR 400MHz, and a new C2D system with DDR2 800MHz all takes about the same loading time It's more like limited to harddisk speed, which most ppl have the normal 7200rpm |
|
|
Oct 20 2007, 10:35 AM
|
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Taman Melati, KL
|
i set all high quality graphic setting with 1024 , no prob , good game
|
|
|
Oct 20 2007, 11:51 AM
|
 
Elite
6,139 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
UT3 is using the "the way it meant to be played - Nvidia" logo and 7900gtx is weak...
mmmm |
|
|
 Oct 20 2007, 11:54 AM
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(lee82gx @ Oct 19 2007, 08:19 PM) only in low-res is the game CPU-bound, that is because in low-res, your GPU is under lower load, and can handle ALL the data your CPU is feeding it. In such a case, the more your CPU can feed the more FPS you get. In hi-res, the situation is reversed. If Anandtech dare to do a CPU comparison at 1600x1200, you will not see such a difference. U mean X2 4800+ vs C2D E4300 no diff at 1600x1200...sounds illogical... X2 4800+ won feed as much as E4400... logically tat is... been lagging wif DVD burning and network handling wif X2 3800+ already... compare to E2140 or even Celeron... X2 3800+ is a dissapointment at it's price... even X2 4200+ is barely a match to E2160... although acceptable performance but not really worth if getting a new rig wif AMD proc...  This post has been edited by t3chn0m4nc3r: Oct 20 2007, 11:55 AM |
|
|
Oct 20 2007, 12:06 PM
|
 
Moderator
9,277 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: KL. Best place in Malaysia. Nuff said 
|
Okaaaayyy... back to topic. Seems that the new UT is not optimised for nVidia only looking at the benchies. but it might be different when the real game comes out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 20 2007, 12:55 PM
|
Senior Member
6,339 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(linkinstreet @ Oct 20 2007, 12:06 PM) Okaaaayyy... back to topic. Seems that the new UT is not optimised for nVidia only looking at the benchies. but it might be different when the real game comes out. Its still a demo, a demo. Badabadapbadapbadap!!! Owh shi- i can't get the song off my head =/ |
|
|
Oct 20 2007, 03:58 PM
|
Senior Member
962 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Kulai
|
yup wait till further optimization is done and when new drivers come out from nvidia -> we should see some performance increase
|
|
|
Oct 20 2007, 09:37 PM
|
Senior Member
737 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
QUOTE(khaidani @ Oct 20 2007, 08:27 AM) ok wat..u r like having a free spa..hehe erm.. i remember now.. i'm not a fan of UT games... my kepala pening looking at all those "aliens" jumping and shooting all around.. anyway..i see that almost all unreal games are friendly with every gc available in market,from low end to high end..with playable framerate.. I remember last time i play unreal 2004 smoothly with geforce 2 reso 800*600,everything is low setting but still got some beautiful effect such as water reflection n etc.. so I do think this upcoming unreal also will be doing the same way..good thing to all unreal fan(no matter rich or poor )  |
|
|
Oct 20 2007, 09:54 PM
|
|
Senior Member
962 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Kulai
|
QUOTE(baok @ Oct 20 2007, 09:37 PM) erm.. i remember now.. i'm not a fan of UT games... my kepala pening looking at all those "aliens" jumping and shooting all around.. haha ut series are meant to be played by those who have hi reflexes becoz everything is fast paced, if u stand idle for a few seconds u'll easily become a sitting duck  |
|
|
Oct 20 2007, 10:53 PM
|
Junior Member
385 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: banting,serdang,uniten
|
yeah..UT will make player always on busy mode, no time to rest though..I love UT
|
|
|
Oct 21 2007, 02:25 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Taman Melati, KL
|
well UT3 game look like quake 3 . . . epic game , now expert Gear of War on window ver. see how is my pc perform
|
|
|
Oct 22 2007, 01:14 PM
|
Senior Member
2,605 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: A Place Between Heaven & Hell
|
QUOTE(t3chn0m4nc3r @ Oct 20 2007, 12:54 PM) U mean X2 4800+ vs C2D E4300 no diff at 1600x1200... AFAIK X2 not really that bad as u think... E6300 vs X2 4200+sounds illogical... X2 4800+ won feed as much as E4400... logically tat is... been lagging wif DVD burning and network handling wif X2 3800+ already... compare to E2140 or even Celeron... X2 3800+ is a dissapointment at it's price... even X2 4200+ is barely a match to E2160... although acceptable performance but not really worth if getting a new rig wif AMD proc... This post has been edited by zeustronic: Oct 22 2007, 04:46 PM |
|
|
Oct 22 2007, 02:48 PM
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(zeustronic @ Oct 22 2007, 01:14 PM) some ppl like talking without use the brain.. yes X2 is not that bad.. it's just amd don't have that super duper '3.5ghz' performance currently.. but heck.. if want more.. prepare to pay more.. me oc.. |
|
|
Oct 23 2007, 03:44 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,262 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Butterworth, Penang
|
Cant wait for the official release. How many looking for Original version over "P" version here? please list out.
|
| Change to: |  0.0210sec
 0.71
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 09:19 PM |
Quote