QUOTE(a_dot_el @ Apr 22 2024, 07:12 PM)
Bayu sutera Tiara sendayan
Hijayu 2
Laman sendayan
This post has been edited by JengLoong96: Apr 23 2024, 05:24 PM
Bandar Sri Sendayan 2
|
|
Apr 22 2024, 09:54 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
112 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 22 2024, 10:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,249 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
recommend you buy from top dev dowan
|
|
|
Apr 22 2024, 10:35 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,902 posts Joined: Sep 2012 |
QUOTE(zenix @ Apr 22 2024, 10:17 PM) even buying from reputable dev also kanahttps://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/...il-for-defects/ Sime Darby Property ordered to pay 6 bungalow owners RM4.8mil for defects SHAH ALAM: The High Court here has ordered Sime Darby Property Bhd to pay six bungalow owners in Bukit Jelutong about RM4.8 million for defects to their properties. Justice Wong Kian Kheong said the plaintiffs had proven their cases against the developer on the balance of probabilities. They were awarded costs totalling RM560,000 and interest at the rate of 5% calculated until full payment of the judgment sum. In the 135-page judgment, Wong said the suits involved the plaintiffs’ right to claim damages for the developer’s breach of its obligations as regards material and good workmanship under statutory sale and purchase agreements (SPAs) entered with the buyers. He said Sime Darby should have instituted third-party proceedings under Order 16 rule 1(1)(a) of the Rules of Court 2012 against Kitacon Sdn Bhd, the main contractor, to claim an indemnity or contribution towards damages payable to the plaintiffs. Four of the plaintiffs had entered into SPAs to buy before, and another two after, the construction of the development known as Primo Bukit Jelutong here between 2010 and 2015. According to the judgment, the six units were bought for between RM4.7 million and RM5.5 million each. In 2017, the owners sued the developer for the cost of rectification of defects to their units. Sime Darby Property, in its defence, denied there were defects and claimed that any shortcomings had been rectified. However, Wong said some of the signatures in the defect rectification forms purportedly submitted by some of the buyers had been forged. He also dismissed the developer’s contention that the defects were caused by renovations carried out by the buyers and were the result of wear and tear. The judge also dismissed the developer’s defence that the two purchasers who bought their homes after the completion of the project did so on an “as is where is” basis. dogbert_chew liked this post
|
|
|
Apr 23 2024, 12:28 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,249 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
QUOTE(JimbeamofNRT @ Apr 22 2024, 10:35 PM) even buying from reputable dev also kana S&P time kasi sign ajehttps://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/...il-for-defects/ Sime Darby Property ordered to pay 6 bungalow owners RM4.8mil for defects SHAH ALAM: The High Court here has ordered Sime Darby Property Bhd to pay six bungalow owners in Bukit Jelutong about RM4.8 million for defects to their properties. Justice Wong Kian Kheong said the plaintiffs had proven their cases against the developer on the balance of probabilities. They were awarded costs totalling RM560,000 and interest at the rate of 5% calculated until full payment of the judgment sum. In the 135-page judgment, Wong said the suits involved the plaintiffs’ right to claim damages for the developer’s breach of its obligations as regards material and good workmanship under statutory sale and purchase agreements (SPAs) entered with the buyers. He said Sime Darby should have instituted third-party proceedings under Order 16 rule 1(1)(a) of the Rules of Court 2012 against Kitacon Sdn Bhd, the main contractor, to claim an indemnity or contribution towards damages payable to the plaintiffs. Four of the plaintiffs had entered into SPAs to buy before, and another two after, the construction of the development known as Primo Bukit Jelutong here between 2010 and 2015. According to the judgment, the six units were bought for between RM4.7 million and RM5.5 million each. In 2017, the owners sued the developer for the cost of rectification of defects to their units. Sime Darby Property, in its defence, denied there were defects and claimed that any shortcomings had been rectified. However, Wong said some of the signatures in the defect rectification forms purportedly submitted by some of the buyers had been forged. He also dismissed the developer’s contention that the defects were caused by renovations carried out by the buyers and were the result of wear and tear. The judge also dismissed the developer’s defence that the two purchasers who bought their homes after the completion of the project did so on an “as is where is” basis. no read anything and fail to realised the lawyer present is working for the interest of the developer not consumer JimbeamofNRT liked this post
|
|
|
May 5 2024, 11:28 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
112 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
QUOTE(estcin @ May 22 2023, 04:06 PM) |
|
|
May 5 2024, 11:29 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
112 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 5 2024, 11:55 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
60 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
Your s&p dont have the clause that developer have to repair the defect? If not you can repair on your own and claim from the lawyer.
|
|
|
May 17 2024, 10:58 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
112 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
QUOTE(JimbeamofNRT @ Apr 22 2024, 11:35 PM) even buying from reputable dev also kana https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/...il-for-defects/ Sime Darby Property ordered to pay 6 bungalow owners RM4.8mil for defects SHAH ALAM: The High Court here has ordered Sime Darby Property Bhd to pay six bungalow owners in Bukit Jelutong about RM4.8 million for defects to their properties. Justice Wong Kian Kheong said the plaintiffs had proven their cases against the developer on the balance of probabilities. They were awarded costs totalling RM560,000 and interest at the rate of 5% calculated until full payment of the judgment sum. In the 135-page judgment, Wong said the suits involved the plaintiffs’ right to claim damages for the developer’s breach of its obligations as regards material and good workmanship under statutory sale and purchase agreements (SPAs) entered with the buyers. He said Sime Darby should have instituted third-party proceedings under Order 16 rule 1(1)(a) of the Rules of Court 2012 against Kitacon Sdn Bhd, the main contractor, to claim an indemnity or contribution towards damages payable to the plaintiffs. Four of the plaintiffs had entered into SPAs to buy before, and another two after, the construction of the development known as Primo Bukit Jelutong here between 2010 and 2015. According to the judgment, the six units were bought for between RM4.7 million and RM5.5 million each. In 2017, the owners sued the developer for the cost of rectification of defects to their units. Sime Darby Property, in its defence, denied there were defects and claimed that any shortcomings had been rectified. However, Wong said some of the signatures in the defect rectification forms purportedly submitted by some of the buyers had been forged. He also dismissed the developer’s contention that the defects were caused by renovations carried out by the buyers and were the result of wear and tear. The judge also dismissed the developer’s defence that the two purchasers who bought their homes after the completion of the project did so on an “as is where is” basis. |
|
|
May 17 2024, 02:23 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,902 posts Joined: Sep 2012 |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2024, 09:42 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
112 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2024, 09:46 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
112 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2024, 09:47 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
112 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2024, 09:49 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
112 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 29 2024, 09:54 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
5 posts Joined: Jan 2010 |
bayu sutera residence here
This post has been edited by kundaichiz: Oct 29 2024, 09:55 PM |
|
|
Oct 29 2024, 09:56 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
112 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
Rubbish
This post has been edited by JengLoong96: Oct 29 2024, 09:57 PM |
|
|
Oct 29 2024, 10:23 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,052 posts Joined: Oct 2017 |
Oct 29 2024, 10:42 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 11 2024, 12:14 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
112 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
|
|
|
Nov 11 2024, 12:16 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
112 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
|
|
|
Nov 11 2024, 12:19 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
112 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
Eka height Not interested Tiara sendayan Not interested Malay area Cyberjaya Not interested Bayu sutera interested Hijayu Chinese area interested Sunsuria city not interested |
|
|
Nov 11 2024, 12:22 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
112 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0206sec
1.48
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 08:06 PM |