No need to buy house

New buyers please don't buy hse with this project. U will regret... Heart sick spend so much of money and facing so much problems with this developer. And the customer Service (ms.kay) manager if ask to many questions will block you.

Bbb UUU, so who is the target market for this huge landed project?

Lol you see the word Matrix, you still want to buy...

https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/5035700/
homebuyers already complaining for years

even buying from reputable dev also kana

https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/...il-for-defects/

Sime Darby Property ordered to pay 6 bungalow owners RM4.8mil for defects

SHAH ALAM: The High Court here has ordered Sime Darby Property Bhd to pay six bungalow owners in Bukit Jelutong about RM4.8 million for defects to their properties.

Justice Wong Kian Kheong said the plaintiffs had proven their cases against the developer on the balance of probabilities.

They were awarded costs totalling RM560,000 and interest at the rate of 5% calculated until full payment of the judgment sum.

In the 135-page judgment, Wong said the suits involved the plaintiffs’ right to claim damages for the developer’s breach of its obligations as regards material and good workmanship under statutory sale and purchase agreements (SPAs) entered with the buyers.

He said Sime Darby should have instituted third-party proceedings under Order 16 rule 1(1)(a) of the Rules of Court 2012 against Kitacon Sdn Bhd, the main contractor, to claim an indemnity or contribution towards damages payable to the plaintiffs.

Four of the plaintiffs had entered into SPAs to buy before, and another two after, the construction of the development known as Primo Bukit Jelutong here between 2010 and 2015.

According to the judgment, the six units were bought for between RM4.7 million and RM5.5 million each.

In 2017, the owners sued the developer for the cost of rectification of defects to their units.

Sime Darby Property, in its defence, denied there were defects and claimed that any shortcomings had been rectified.

However, Wong said some of the signatures in the defect rectification forms purportedly submitted by some of the buyers had been forged.

He also dismissed the developer’s contention that the defects were caused by renovations carried out by the buyers and were the result of wear and tear.

The judge also dismissed the developer’s defence that the two purchasers who bought their homes after the completion of the project did so on an “as is where is” basis.

Your s&p dont have the clause that developer have to repair the defect? If not you can repair on your own and claim from the lawyer.

S&P time kasi sign aje
no read anything
and fail to realised the lawyer present is working for the interest of the developer not consumer  :sweat:

Lol you see the word Matrix, you still want to buy...

Tropicana ALAM Puncak Alam RM580K

bayu sutera residence here :) . Yeah almost all owner there will complain on defect. Crack wall like a must. My house included.. haiyoh

Stay puchong

Suria height sendayan RM900k