C la. because most expensive

https://www.google.com/maps/@1.4873119,103....6384!8i8192

how about this?

okay lor

here another one


https://www.google.com/maps/@2.1864339,102....6384!8i8192

A First. Then C. Finally B.

yahor

this direction one also no berhenti sign

while the other three have

so this one can shoot out no need to stop ?

Slow slow like the beemer?

This thread have potential to beat tetek besar thread. Good to know that M'sians or at least Ktards are more traffic safety conscious. Anthony will be pleased

Plotek..plotekk..... Maybe they got play FX triumph hmmm
By law, it's the car fault.
Priority to moto in this case.
Normal scenario/ straight road then maybe moto asking for it but this case nope.
She got priority to go out of junction if the car did not cross the white line yet.

Actually have 1 question, hypothetically speaking, if the motor was moving straight instead of coming out of the junction, BMW driver not paying attention, will this accident happen?

Now you guys know why certain group of males always blame the females whenever there is a rape case? It's not about the rapist but rather, why is the female wearing clothes that are too revealing, or why is the female alone there, why is the female out at this hour, she should have just stayed in the kitchen & there won't be any rape case, etc.

It's the same here kek. BMW knocked down a motorcyclist but certain group of people rather put more priority on why did the motorcyclist didn't fasten her helmet properly, why did the motorcyclist came out of the junction first, why did the motorcyclist not ride on further left or ride on the curb or ride in the drain on the left, why didn't the motorcyclist expect the car to break the traffic rules in the first place, why is the road designed like this, where else got such road design, etc.

I'm referring to the victim blaming tendency. Are you one of those who know rapist are at fault BUT at the same time blame the rape victims too for wearing inappropriate clothes or being out at the wrong time as well?

I've mentioned this before but substitute that motorcycle with your own car & that BMW rammed into you. Will you tap the BMW owner's shoulder & say "hey, I know I'm also at fault so let's share the car repair fees 50/50?"

If you have to add "victim should have / would have / could have" then it's no different than saying that the victim did contribute to the incident. You can play around with words & I know where you're going with the video about bad decisions but you're still putting the victim on the spot where the incidents should have / could have / would have played out differently if she did something else than what transpired on that day.

I wrote 76 words & your only come back was based on that 3 words? Wow... much enlightenment today.

so did the victim contribute to this accident or not?

Kekwa

Penang in top 5 lah
but definitely not top 1

then injury is top one, but we're survivors

but death? only #5 jer