Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Rumah Selangorku 300k cap ayam, parking fish pond
|
azarimy
|
 Mar 16 2023, 01:09 PM
|
mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
|
QUOTE(emburrar @ Mar 16 2023, 12:56 PM) pembeli rumah di Pangsapuri Harmoni 1, Putra Heights yang menyifatkan kegembiraan untuk memiliki rumah kini bertukar menjadi nasib ‘malang. Harga rumah hampir mencecah RM300,000 tetapi retaknya merata, parkir umpama kolam ikan, berlumut dan berkeladak. sebahagian besar penduduk di pangsapuri ini, timbul juga persoalan bagaimana projek ini diberikan Sijil Perakuan Kelayakan (CF). Penduduk dalam masa sama mendakwa pihak pemaju seakan mengambil kesempatan terhadap pembeli untuk mengaut keuntungan walaupun menyedari ia merupakan projek perumahan ‘Rumah Selangorku’.  Sime Darby project also cap ayam That ramp grove is wrong. The chevron patterns must point up on both sides. This to flow water from middle of the ramp down to the side. If you look on the left ramp, the chevron pattern points down. This causes water to accumulate in the middle of the ramp, and create a cascading waterfall. |
|
|
|
|
|
azarimy
|
Mar 16 2023, 01:35 PM
|
mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
|
QUOTE(max_cavalera @ Mar 16 2023, 01:10 PM) I thought for this kidna design in parking complex need a longkang and water trap right?? Or is it not required to get CF approval? Not sure about this requirement on these kind of parking lot. Will check. |
|
|
|
|
|
azarimy
|
Mar 16 2023, 02:35 PM
|
mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
|
QUOTE(cruel_boy86 @ Mar 16 2023, 02:04 PM) and how does that changes the outcome? water still gonna flow DOWN to accumulate at the low end either way. there should have been a bump or drain to stop water flowing from the road down the ramp into parking floor. cant see if its there Actually, it needs cut-off drains on the upper side and lower side of the ramp. Just now I was looking on the smaller screen, didn't notice it didn't have those or even scupper drains on the sides. So yes, many things are missing, plus the ramp chevrons on the wrong orientation. |
|
|
|
|
|
azarimy
|
Mar 18 2023, 03:31 PM
|
mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
|
QUOTE(ceras @ Mar 18 2023, 11:43 AM) The groove is indication of direction of traffic flow. If simply face the directions, nanti kena accident. I'm sure all levels are the same. Drainage is another issue but that is not the primary function of the grooves. I can tell you for certain it's NOT to show traffic flow. There are arrows painted yellow or white for that reason. |
|
|
|
|
|
azarimy
|
Mar 18 2023, 05:43 PM
|
mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
|
QUOTE(ceras @ Mar 18 2023, 05:20 PM) do you see painted arrows in all ramps at all condo's ? If there are no painted arrows, how would one decide which lane is going up or down? Painted arrows to indicate the flow of traffic are COMPULSORY in all developments. The grooves, on the other hand, are not. I mean, have you seen these?   |
|
|
|
|
|
azarimy
|
Mar 19 2023, 06:48 PM
|
mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
|
QUOTE(ceras @ Mar 19 2023, 12:56 PM) what you show are marked arrows that are necessary as they do not have directional grooves built into the design to indicate traffic flow direction. . No one will illogically have arrow like design if they do not have a directional purpose. Show me one ramp with directional arrow grooves which have painted arrows indicating in a completely opposite direction. ONE? How about THREE?    Enough or not? |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0265sec
0.18
6 queries
GZIP Disabled