QUOTE(mushigen @ Mar 13 2023, 11:46 AM)
But why would Bank A discharge the property at RM100k out of pocket with no collateral in hand?
Simple, everything is agreed before proceed from all parties (Bank A, TS (can refer back to your own loan agreement), Auction House, Bank B)
One must understand every transaction between 2 parties will not/shall interfere another one along way.
If one notice, all this involved the most important element which is time.
All involved is clearly stated of time frame to complete the transaction within certain period of time agreed.
Failing to do so will incur financial losses which is interest which need to bare by whoever involved in the delay (usually chorology will be raise to pinpoint the culprit)
In lay man term for such situation, with court order that Bank A role is upon receiving payment from Bank B is to release title.
This is an agreement and understanding between Bank A and Bank B on auction property with court order.
Whatever shortfall. it's Bank A role to settle by using in house or third party debt collector, placing caveat on other existing asset, or file for bankruptcy action.
These are the ways to recoup back with no collateral in hand.
Imagine Bank A doesn't use own reserve to complete the transaction, Bank B wont able to charge title, Buyer B wont able to stay on the property
which eventually everything in stand still and disrupt the cycle.
Remember this is a Bank, not a property agency or developer.
They don't need your property nor they want it either. It's the transaction along the way brings the value to it.