The risk is not the issue... is the seller not being honest
JACKO-D (TRANSFORMERS) dispute, - removed by RBR -
| Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed New Topic New Poll |
JACKO-D (TRANSFORMERS) dispute, - removed by RBR -
|
|
Oct 4 2007, 08:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,149 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
The risk is not the issue... is the seller not being honest
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2007, 08:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,149 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
LOL jacko-D, stop acting you are like some old grandpa who knows everything. You are just a twat. Oopps... ok language...remember now
|
|
|
Oct 4 2007, 08:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,149 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
The point is, it is juz impossible that the buyer spoil the thing he bought!
|
|
|
Oct 4 2007, 08:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,149 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
yeah, exactly. They wouldn't. Except they are a conman
And the buyer got TWO models from you. If he wants to get at you, why did he only claim that you sold him one faulty item, not two? Just admit it, refund and be a good boy alrite? This post has been edited by zc_squash: Oct 4 2007, 08:52 PM |
|
|
Oct 4 2007, 08:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,149 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
Why is the door at third photo not aligned, eh?
Hm, the authenticity of the photos even dubious, as a previous forumer had mentioned. Added on October 4, 2007, 9:00 pm QUOTE(sense_less143 @ Oct 4 2007, 08:58 PM) A note on other people also.. Erm, can this be considered a prima facie case? I guess it could Stop badmouthing other people.. especially watch on the language. If you get him mad, chances are he'll be more reluctant to help fix the problem.. Innocent until proven guilty, yes? Conflicts are bad enough as it is.. Again, not taking sides.. This post has been edited by zc_squash: Oct 4 2007, 09:01 PM |
|
|
Oct 4 2007, 09:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,149 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
The seller is not answering his calls nor replying his sms-es.
|
|
|
Oct 5 2007, 12:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,149 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(jacko-d @ Oct 4 2007, 09:09 PM) I din post the item as new in the first place i said it was a second hand item and I did sms him back saying it is a second item is very different from a 'damaged' item, dude.Added on October 5, 2007, 12:38 am QUOTE(duo8668 @ Oct 4 2007, 09:11 PM) anyway jacko-d ... base at 1st post of TS ... u shouldnt told the TS to fix and resell this item bac at RM 300 . Indirectly, he already admitted the item was in a bad condition and it should be fixed. Now, why would a good item should be fixed?This post has been edited by zc_squash: Oct 5 2007, 12:38 AM |
|
|
Oct 5 2007, 01:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,149 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
His sms people... his sms to the buyer already indirectly showed that he knew the item was spoilt and should be fixed.
He must be laughing his ass off now he got a broken toy off his hands...for RM300! This post has been edited by zc_squash: Oct 5 2007, 01:28 AM |
|
|
Oct 5 2007, 01:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,149 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
It leaves a bad taste in my mouth seeing a new forumer coming in just to buy a Transformers and got ripped off in his first trade in low yat =(
|
|
|
Oct 5 2007, 02:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,149 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(kerazul @ Oct 5 2007, 02:13 AM) [attachmentid=305895] Very analytical and makes whole lotsa sense. And yeah, the text in bold answered somebody's question in few pages back.Okay... the following pics have not been altered in anyway. From the pics, we can conclude that the photos that the TS took and the seller took are of the same machine. Notice the slight dents highlighted by the red circles. This rules out the TS trying to con the seller into refunding him for a similar but faulty item. Next, the TS mentioned that the seller failed to notify him of the condition of the paint on the item. From the pictures, it is evident that the pics posted by the seller clearly misrepresents the actual condition (Heck, it looks perfect. See the picture above with reference to the blue circles). This is considered fraudulent misrepresentation already. Finally, the whole sms fiasco of the seller asking the TS to fix the item and resell it instead of denying that it was sent in that condition really freaks me out man. So obvious right? My money's on the TS in this case. He deserves a refund and nothing less. He clearly did not get what he bargained for in the first place This post has been edited by zc_squash: Oct 5 2007, 02:19 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0174sec
0.92
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 03:18 PM |