Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed New Topic New Poll

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> JACKO-D (TRANSFORMERS) dispute, - removed by RBR -

Share on | Track this topic | Print this topic
J-Slade
post Oct 4 2007, 08:40 PM

|[ Phenom II ]|
*******
Senior Member
2,823 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: West Malaysia
QUOTE(alanyuppie @ Oct 4 2007, 08:32 PM)
hmm.. from the look of the pics.. the whites are maxed out (purposely adjusted to hide flaws?), and still notice some chipped off paint at the corners. I wonder if the whites are toned down, how the toys will looks like. hope its not in "Vandalised" mode.
*
Guys, download the pictures to your PC,

right click > properties > summary > Advanced


You will see the photo is taken by a Canon Digital Ixus 75 on the 2nd October 2007. Has Jacko-D sent out the toy already by then? If he has, then it is not the same unit as being sold to the TS
J-Slade
post Oct 4 2007, 08:50 PM

|[ Phenom II ]|
*******
Senior Member
2,823 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: West Malaysia
Actually I agree..... impossible the TS spoil it to get at Jacko.... I mean c'mon is a Binaltech for goodness sake. They don't make these anymore. ANd RM300 is not a small amount of money... surely the TS paid handsomely cos he is a transformers fan. I doubt any tom d*** and harry will fork out so much money for ntg. He surely knows the value of it...
J-Slade
post Oct 4 2007, 08:53 PM

|[ Phenom II ]|
*******
Senior Member
2,823 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: West Malaysia
QUOTE(zc_squash @ Oct 4 2007, 08:50 PM)
yeah, exactly. They wouldn't. Except they are a conman smile.gif
*
And yea... even if he plan to purposely spoil it, he shld know that if the seller can produce a picture before send out, then case close cannot claim anything..






Unless...... jeng x 3


The TS has a spoilt exact same model, he buy a mint one from Jacko then come here show picture of his already spoilt Mustang binaltech in hope to get a refund and then he also get to keep the mint one.... whistling.gif

scary eh?
J-Slade
post Oct 4 2007, 09:10 PM

|[ Phenom II ]|
*******
Senior Member
2,823 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: West Malaysia
QUOTE(pitinn @ Oct 4 2007, 09:06 PM)
THE BEST THING IS U ALL COME OUT A PLACE AND TALK...RM300 for a stupid toys is KINDA EXPENSIVE for me..U say he tape all the SPOILT TRANSFORMER BACK rite???When COD juz show him.....
*
ei ei... its a Binaltech Transformers ler.... laugh.gif


No longer in production and very rare.
J-Slade
post Oct 4 2007, 09:18 PM

|[ Phenom II ]|
*******
Senior Member
2,823 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: West Malaysia
QUOTE(phunkydude @ Oct 4 2007, 09:11 PM)
cut the crap...`

again, back to the main point..
Mint condition doesn't mean loose parts with taped joints!!!!

now, deny that if u can.
*
People, please don't simply say things unless you know the situation

QUOTE(jacko-d @ Oct 4 2007, 08:18 PM)
I believe all the Binaltech collectors know that the paint will fall off easily when you transform the item, after some transformation and the paint happens to fall off and the ball joint actually become very loose,and i did inform you there are minor paint chip as you all can see it from my picture as well,now you want to blame it on me.
*
The seller claims he has informed the buyer of the condition before selling it.


This is not a con-case. Just a minor misunderstanding. To solve this, just show print screen of the PM (Private Messages) between the seller and buyer and WE will be the judge as to whether the buyer misunderstand, or the seller didn't explain things properly.


Henceforth please do not curse until the prove is shown. C'mon... lets sort this out the proper way aight?

Added on October 4, 2007, 9:22 pmAnd btw... the person who lodge the complain football8515 hasn't even said a word other than the 1st post.

Why is everyone fighting against Jacko like he con everyone in this thread. You guys are shooting blanks man...

This post has been edited by J-Slade: Oct 4 2007, 09:22 PM
J-Slade
post Oct 5 2007, 07:36 PM

|[ Phenom II ]|
*******
Senior Member
2,823 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: West Malaysia
QUOTE(kerazul @ Oct 5 2007, 02:13 AM)
[attachmentid=305895]

*
kerazul... you are awesome man... really observant. notworthy.gif

Anyway I guess jacko-D deserved his dispute tag for now... anyway he hasn't come back to defend his stand. We'll just have to wait and see what he has to say... smile.gif
J-Slade
post Oct 6 2007, 12:35 AM

|[ Phenom II ]|
*******
Senior Member
2,823 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: West Malaysia
QUOTE(soggie @ Oct 6 2007, 12:28 AM)
You can read? Go read what the dispute tag means. He deserves the dispute tag, because he HAS a dispute going on. The longer he wants this dispute to go on, the longer he'll be stuck with that tag. So why are you crying out for him?
*
Actually its true... the point of a dispute is to prove yourself innocent. Since jacko hasn't come back, he will be guilty unless proved otherwise.


Actually to be honest, I feel kinda bad for him. Because you'll never know that he clearly mentioned the condition to the buyer but it got ignored.
« Next Oldest · Dispute Resolution Corner · Next Newest »
 

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0201sec    0.59    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 06:09 PM
All Rights Reserved 2002- 2020 Vijandren Ramadass (~ unite against racism ~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.