Hi,
I'm so surprising that seems Fuji user choosing S6500fd instead S9600...Why??
Isn't the S9600 better than S6500fd??
Which will you recommeded?
Any Fuji S9600 user around?
Any Fuji S9600 user around?
|
|
Oct 4 2007, 03:27 PM, updated 19y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,512 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
Hi,
I'm so surprising that seems Fuji user choosing S6500fd instead S9600...Why?? Isn't the S9600 better than S6500fd?? Which will you recommeded? |
|
|
Oct 5 2007, 09:38 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,863 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang, Land of Laksa and Char Koay Teow |
Dude,
Theres already an existing Fuji thread you can head on to http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/277563 Anyway, Im using the 9600, and i would say, even both are identical, but 9600 has better WB settings. and you have a few extra connections like CF card support, Flash hotshoe (NOT i-TTL). |
|
|
Oct 5 2007, 01:12 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,512 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
QUOTE(m|ng @ Oct 5 2007, 09:38 AM) Dude, Hey thanks for the thread link.Theres already an existing Fuji thread you can head on to http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/277563 Anyway, Im using the 9600, and i would say, even both are identical, but 9600 has better WB settings. and you have a few extra connections like CF card support, Flash hotshoe (NOT i-TTL). I'm still not understand about i-TTL..mind to explain? |
| Change to: | 0.0126sec
0.65
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 01:55 AM |