water splitting using high temperature (500°–2,000°C) which produce hydrogen & oxygen can be achieved by either concentrating sunlight or using waste heat from nuclear reactor.

artificial photosynthesis haven't been commercialized yet.

using hydrogen as fuel can probably cut on charging time & slow down battery degradation on fast charging.

using solar-powered only for car is still inefficient on current tech, need redundancy.

welp, hydrogen is unstable, maybe can take an extra step on using glucose as fuel which glucose can be turned to hydrogen+co2¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

No lar. Hydrogen storage is more troublesome only and very volatile. Not more powerful than nuclear lar.

Using hydrogen is USELESS.

96% of the world's hydrogen comes from fossil fuels.....

I guess they slept through their lessons back in school....

I think he confused it with fusion. Nuclear fusion (hydrogen bomb) is of course way more powerful than nuclear fission (classic nuclear bomb).

u think y large size commercial vehicles use hydrogen instead of battery, e.g. train, truck, plane

sebab for high mileage, large battery size has worse mileage efficiency compared to hydrogen

unless the solid state battery or graphene battery could be commercialized, then diff story

Really ah? Hmm then this unker kena con by yutub video liao, say hydrogen and its vehicle counterpart is driving bombs all around the world. Illuminati idea to kebabom the world konons.

https://www.theverge.com/2022/9/23/23368339...ration-strategy

i guess the miracle to make more clean hydrogen is coming faster than any miracle malaysians will one day read before posting on the internet. pity.