QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Sep 29 2007, 03:10 PM)
dude have u ACUTALLY TRIED this cards...
and its cheaper by Rm100. dude..
but gets beat
well it is having a hard time... wait for my review 8800gts A3 revisiong +HR03+FM123.. still cheaper than ure HD2900xt and 8800gtx... and its going to beat them both in certain games....
since u guys like benchies...
will be benching against HD2900xt, EVGA 8800gts 640mb, XFX 8800gtx XXX.
will be doing later with HD2900pro, HD2950 pro with the R600.
the reason for overclocking is to compensate performance and cost .. to out preform a higher priced card etc..
until u can show any proof of 24/7 overclocking on ure cards.. ure just a bigot and a benchmark enthusiast.
Firstly, a review cant separate these cards ... im not against u or anything.. but imo, ati HD series cards has ou performed almost any 8800 series card at 3d mark 06. and 05 as well iirc... but in real world gaming, teh nvidia cards outperform the ati cards.. it has something to do with the shader clocks or something like that... , adn also iirc in VISTA teh ati cards seem to be beter.. so if ur a hardcore bencher then u should og and get teh hd2900 series... if u are a high end gamer then go for the 8800gtx , but if ur a midrange gamer, with a 22" screen trust me u wont see any difference between the cards... diff of fps might be there.. but the minimum fps is so high thats its in the 40+ regions in new games... u wont see lag at all...
bro a HD2900Xt vs a 8800gtx in 3d mark 06 , stock clocks, and using a 3.2 quad , the average score is 8800gtx 11k + , HD2900XT 12k~13k + .
ur gts rev 3 can outperform them yes.. but it needs to be clocked.. , if i go and get a 2900pro, yes u can beat it with ur gts, but thats already the limits of ur gts, while i can still clock the 2900pro...adn in certain games do u mean nvidia optimized games? at wat resolution ?
bro im not challenging ur views.. neither do i say ur wrong.. but u didnt elaborate ur views enough ...
peace