But why would China militarily invade Malaysia tho?

Sohai US puppet.

Zelenskyy won 73% of the vote in the last run-off election in 2019. Like that you might as well claim 73% of Ukrainian voters were bribed by US or are neo-Nazis.

Just my sample news. Like I said in my other replies, news is to make what people believe. It is more like propaganda machine. You never really know how true.

Russia invade Ukraine is wrong, but US the shit stirrer not right also

stir what shit lol

whole of NATO was at peace until Russia attacked in 2015
nonsense, of course it matters. History is not as subjective as popularly memed

Yes
No
Yes
What era is that?

NATO was at an all time low in preparedness in 2015, easily understood by examination of their defence policies of the time, if one wishes to be informed

in WW2 all weapons that could be invented were being used, with the exception of gas which had been agreed as an unacceptable WMD

it was only in the 50s that, following experiments, nations realised how dangerous nuclear weapons are. only then did nuclear weapons acquire the stigma that they have today.

hindsight is 20/20, but it's an inaccurate way to assess historical decisions

nonsense

we've been through this

there were no bases and missiles at Russia's borders, furthermore, it is not an acceptable casus belli

NATO in 2015 was in the middle of withdrawing troops from the Continent, as a matter of FACT

average defence budget across NATO had been in constant drawdown since the end of the Cold War and reached an all-time low in 2015

the British was almost completing a redeployment of troops out of Germany, and closing down former Cold War bases

the US, as all here should know, was in the middle of the Pacific Pivot and had no major ground troops in Europe

NOBODY expected a war against Russia in 2015

who's the one preparing for war here?:

In 2013, the USA's defence budget was 4.48% of its GDP, or USD 754 bn / 16,800 bn

In 2013, Russia's defence budget was 3.14% of its GDP, or 110 bn / 3,500 bn in PPP-adjusted US dollars

In 2013, China's estimated defence budget was of 1.07% of its GDP, or 266 bn / 15,500 bn in PPP-adjusted US dollars

the USA's defence budgeting policy had been to spend about as much as China and Russia combined, relative to GDP, and you can see that the percentages are roughly there (4.48 vs 4.21)

before complaining that "hey the dollar value is 754 bn vs a total of 376 bn", bear in mind that defence budgets include personnel expenditure, and the cost of living in USA is much much much higher than Russia and China
lol you consider this to be a lie? okay, sure, I will amend that: NATO is not at war with Russia. happy?

there's certainly truth in that statement. but what the point is, relative to this discussion, escapes me.

mainly the part relative to its radioactive effects, since the world seems to accept the use of conventional weapons of equal destruction

that's just how it is; I don't make the rules

maybe you should read up on WW2 history...?

Why don't you answer the question; do you consider NATO to be at war?

And no, I did not lie; I never said NATO is in a legal state of war, nor did I say that Russia declared war on NATO.

if you think PPP is not important, well... go ahead and argue that out with economists why they are still using a pointless measurement

...I don't know what your point is, your rhetoric is too high-flying for me to penetrate. Not that I bother that much to be honest.

On the surface it's clear that you either haven't read enough about WW2 or pretend not to; whichever it is, I don't care lol

...from the bruh/bro to the paggro to the rambling, I really don't know what's going on

kk whatever