if i drive on a road, i would anticipate may be there are lubang or may be there are branches from roadside tree or even breakdown cars etc, but budak nyamuk is not something that i am supposed to anticipate.

like the highway construction material drop and kill the driver case, will you say hey itu driver sepatutnya anticipate benda nak jatuh, so driver tu salah dan patut dipenjara kalau dia tak mati?

and for the umpteenth times, the MIROS has already determined that she was not speeding.

how much reduce is considered reduce?

if the road is stipulated to be save at 50, and she was determined not over 50, how much you want her to slow down?

40 can kill, 30 also can, a 5km/h car can kill too.

if you consider the case of lawan arus, the one who lawan arus memang salah, but can you say the one who are on the right way salah because he never slow down and anticipate a lawan arus car?

it is absolutely absurd to argue like that.

So now anecdotal claim is more important?

Miros examination can buang ke laut?

The lajak, lawan arus, mabuk etc make a surprise entry and fck up the traffic which cause the accident means you should just slow down like turtle and if still langgar means you did not slow down enough and should masuk jail?

a 30km/h car need 1 second to move more than 8 meters.

so if you have a great eyesight and great reflex to floor the brake after 1 second, the car is already 8meters away.

there is no magic to stop immediately.

now don't tell me should drive at 20 or 10 km/h.