No im not offended. You seems to be the one offended because of muslim scholar forbiding muslim to return favour by cleabing the temple. That does not in any mean we are intolerant to other religion. It just means that some set of rules must be followed by muslim.
My explaination does not mean im offended. I dont really care whether it is UAI or DrMaza or ASWAJA who mention this. Im just explaining the reason UAI said so to those who want to know why.
If you choose to ignore..do you think i care hahah. Im stopping here, ive made my point especially to fellow muslim an curious non..  you can continue your ranting and complaining on our religion. It will still be the same islam. No change

So you butthurt leh?
I thought most of non said nahhh..we dont bother pun.
My concern is for the muslim.
It shouldnt offend the non muslim because we are not really punching you right. What a funny analogy lol.

Tak offended kunun tapi macam kena tumbuk pula.

My view is non muslim should not be offended abd should respect other teaching. That is what being tolerant is.

Not returning favour cleaning the temple due to abiding islamic teaching should not offend the non muslim.  Right?

Please dont use such rubbish analogy of yours it doesnt suit the context discussed here. Killing is a big sin and cant be compared at all.  I dont see any intolerance in any way..especially when the non..or maybe just you no butthurt with the set of rules aforementioned in Islam.. i think i layan to much of your trolling. Better talk to the hand.

If it doesnt offend others, then where is the intolerance in the first place? So you still think killing analogy make sense? Hehe.  Anyone else concur with this? Tis  islamophic /k logic is new to me.