there's another video, this one shows the car even better

ayam personally like crv and harrier if i wanna buy suv.

but well, ayam not a suv fans.

CX-3 is a crossover (competes in the same class has HR-V) unpinning the Mazda2 chassis.

CX-30 is also a crossover but it underpins the Mazda3 chassis - simply, it is a CX-3 but far superior.

same goes with CX-5 and CX-50.

so most likely a crossover suv then

probably more steady on the road than cx5

nice.. slighly different from kodo design languange

I can still remember, the first day i owned a mazda 6 GJ, bermaz havent launched it yet. i drove 1000km north to Perlis, and got the 1k km service done at kedah. the sc was shocked to see the car was already on the road. so dont ever think if not yet marketed in Malaysia, doesnt mean its not on the road.

Unker think the same...jaga2 bro later cx-5 owner in here hati panas ur wording...they blow 150k rm for someone to diss it off just like that

Rav4 interior look way better than cx5. Cx5 font even have a touch screen headunit

Too bad this seems like a US only product. Will be made in US only

i rike. not cacat curvy kodok design like hondak crv

he comparing with self imaginary CAR ....

Kek UMW didnt even bother to give proper full spec head unit for 200k+ Rav4

Ugly and basic? The minimalist/basic design is by choice from them, but ugly or nice depend on each person la

cx5 is already due for replacement de. i hate the dated infotainment and meter cluster

its forum afterall, not that the design is godlike tier that must be liked by everyone.

ok la maybe not ugly and basic, it just looks like a bit 'potato' to me.
again, its one man's meat is another man's poison.
anyway i bought a hilux last month, dont see myself buying suv in near future.
i owned a recond vellfire for family outings if that matters.

It is if you compare it to Merc, BMW, and Volvo. Cars that Mazda says it is competing with!

If you compare it to the cars in its same segment, it is miles ahead!

can go inside water?

Nope. Cx50 uses the same platform as cx30.

Yea it's more or less to each person's preference, for me I quite like mazda interior because its understated and as a driver POV you can see they design little things more ergonomically to suit a driver abit like how they tilt the angle of the screen abit towards you or something.

same old Mazda. nothing new

Tbh if you compare with these premium brands, I actually prefer mazda interior over the likes of merc, imo sometimes they overdo on the looks with too much steel/silver to the point it compromise usability, especially on the centre console buttons and door buttons. Volvo vs mazda, I'm in the opinion that against the likes of like xc40 vs mazda xc40 looks even more basic than mazda to me, both are extremely basic but mazda has some elegance to the basicness (if that makes any sense). Bmw I'm indifferent to it, never really liked the interior it just feels clunky to me based on driving E90 & F10