Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Why Japan Didnt invade thailand in ww2 ?, This is interesting to learn

views
     
TAZIO.N
post Sep 10 2021, 12:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
171 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
Iinm,Japs wanted tin and rubber,at that time Malaya got that in abundance,Thailand tarak so it's easier lah for them Thais to nego with Japanese...
xCM
post Sep 10 2021, 12:51 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
535 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: 4:44 am
Actually Mareshia should follow Thailand

So now we can have jap mois around us

This post has been edited by xCM: Sep 10 2021, 12:53 PM
zib5
post Sep 10 2021, 01:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
119 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
simple: Siam wasn't ruled by any European power at the time so there is no reason for Japan to attack Thailand.
Zanei Gundan
post Sep 10 2021, 01:21 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
143 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: My Bloody Valentine
tl;dr

when you can't beat them - join them
SUSbananajoe
post Sep 10 2021, 01:22 PM

PhotoPhag
****
Junior Member
661 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: BananaLand



QUOTE(zib5 @ Sep 10 2021, 01:14 PM)
simple: Siam wasn't ruled by any European power at the time so there is no reason for Japan to attack Thailand.
*
Actual reason was not because of that.

Japan has limited war resources, their focus is malaya for tins and raw resources as well as Singapore for the port.


Thai has nothing much to offer. If Axis indeed won the war and Japan manage to retain malaya, Indonesia as well as Philippines, they will eventually invade thailand to complete their plan.


DarkAeon
post Sep 10 2021, 01:23 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
774 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(olay biscuit barrel @ Sep 10 2021, 11:42 AM)
Jap: Open up or we'll make you open up.

Thai: *spreads legs

Also every Thai: We weren't invaded.
You can't rape the willing.
*
the wisdom in your post is mind boggling
empyreal
post Sep 10 2021, 01:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
2,036 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: KL


QUOTE(sportivo @ Sep 10 2021, 11:53 AM)
There nothing wrong for being neutral in WW2 while regained back lost territories as bonus
*
Thai wasnt neutral - they were part of the axis.

The only reason the uk didnt attack thailand was because the us said enough, so the thai had to give back the territories plus war reparations.
kcchong2000
post Sep 10 2021, 01:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
Bekerjasama lar with jepunis. They are the one to let them masuk malaysia. Lol
ju146
post Sep 10 2021, 01:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,594 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
scare terpiap batang... so buat laluan jer
DarkAeon
post Sep 10 2021, 01:29 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
774 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(kcchong2000 @ Sep 10 2021, 01:27 PM)
Bekerjasama lar with jepunis. They are the one to let them masuk malaysia. Lol
*
pandai dia main

depan axis - yo, aku gang yo
depan org lain lepas axis kalah - saya terpaksa je
kcchong2000
post Sep 10 2021, 01:32 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(DarkAeon @ Sep 10 2021, 01:29 PM)
pandai dia main

depan axis - yo, aku gang yo
depan org lain lepas axis kalah - saya terpaksa je
*
Biasalah. if you are Thai King that time also will do like this. Surely, i dun wan become poland. Let Malaya kena blitzkrieg.
sportivo
post Sep 10 2021, 03:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
64 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(Sycamore @ Sep 10 2021, 12:42 PM)
Last I check, that is not the definition of neutral in dictionary.
*
if isn’t Neutral whats your definition?
Siam giving free access passage to Imperial Japanese to liberate and attack western colonies in return Siam maintains sovereignty without any bloodshed on her subjects plus regains her lost territories due to unfair treaty with western colonialists.
Neither Siam offer military assistance nor involved directly in WW2 combat siding Imperial Japan. Its retarded to think Siam will sacrifice her military to assist western allies to fight a war that doesn’t benefited her.

Do you know why Siam rename to Thailand after end of WW2?
Sycamore
post Sep 10 2021, 03:37 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
334 posts

Joined: Jun 2015
From: underneath the grove of sycamore
QUOTE(sportivo @ Sep 10 2021, 03:36 PM)
Do you know why Siam rename to Thailand after end of WW2?
*
Tell me what do you know.
SUSbananajoe
post Sep 10 2021, 03:45 PM

PhotoPhag
****
Junior Member
661 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: BananaLand



QUOTE(sportivo @ Sep 10 2021, 03:36 PM)
if isn’t Neutral whats your definition?
Siam giving free access passage to Imperial Japanese to liberate and attack western colonies in return Siam maintains sovereignty without any bloodshed on her subjects plus regains her lost territories due to unfair treaty with western colonialists.
Neither Siam offer military assistance nor involved directly in WW2 combat siding Imperial Japan. Its retarded to think Siam will sacrifice her military to assist western allies to fight a war that doesn’t benefited her.

Do you know why Siam rename to Thailand after end of WW2?
*
QUOTE
The country was renamed on June 23rd, 1939. Stamps commemorating King Rama VI (left) and King Rama IX (right). People speaking one of the Tai group of languages settled in what is now Thailand around 1,000 years ago.

Source : https://www.historytoday.com/archive/siam-b...0%20years%20ago.
Name change was done before WW2

This post has been edited by bananajoe: Sep 10 2021, 03:46 PM
SUSbananajoe
post Sep 10 2021, 03:50 PM

PhotoPhag
****
Junior Member
661 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: BananaLand



QUOTE(sportivo @ Sep 10 2021, 03:36 PM)
if isn’t Neutral whats your definition?
Siam giving free access passage to Imperial Japanese to liberate and attack western colonies in return Siam maintains sovereignty without any bloodshed on her subjects plus regains her lost territories due to unfair treaty with western colonialists.
Neither Siam offer military assistance nor involved directly in WW2 combat siding Imperial Japan. Its retarded to think Siam will sacrifice her military to assist western allies to fight a war that doesn’t benefited her.

Do you know why Siam rename to Thailand after end of WW2?
*
Not sure where you got that info but Japan actually invade first. And at the same time, There was a coup and new regime that favours japanese came to power. You can read it up in wiki.

QUOTE

Thailand in World War II officially adopted a position of neutrality until the five hour-long Japanese invasion of Thailand on 8 December 1941, which led to an armistice and military alliance treaty between Thailand and the Japanese Empire in mid-December 1941. At the start of the Pacific War, the Japanese Empire pressured the Thai government to allow the passage of Japanese troops to invade British-held Malaya and Burma. The Thai government under Plaek Phibunsongkhram (known simply as Phibun) considered it profitable to co-operate with the Japanese war efforts, since Thailand saw Japan – who promised to help Thailand regain some of the Indochinese territories (in today's Laos, Cambodia, and Myanmar) which had been lost to France – as an ally against Western imperialism. Axis-aligned Thailand declared war on the United Kingdom and the United States and annexed territories in neighbouring countries, expanding to the north, south, and east, gaining a border with China near Kengtung.


The territories and boundaries of Kingdom of Thailand in World War II.
After becoming an ally of the Empire of Japan, Thailand retained control of its armed forces and internal affairs. The Japanese policy on Thailand differed from their relationship with the puppet state of Manchukuo. Japan intended bilateral relationships similar to those between Nazi Germany and Finland, Bulgaria, and Romania. However, Thailand at that time was labelled by both the Japanese and the Allies as the "Italy of Asia".[why?]

Meanwhile, the Thai government had split into two factions: the Phibun regime and the Free Thai Movement, a well-organised, pro-Allied resistance movement that eventually numbered around 90,000 Thai guerrillas, supported by government officials allied to the regent Pridi Banomyong. The movement was active from 1942, resisting the Phibun regime and the Japanese. The partisans provided espionage services to the Allies, performed some sabotage activities, and helped engineer Phibun's downfall in 1944. After the war, Thailand returned the annexed territories but received little punishment for its wartime role under Phibun.
Source : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thailand_in_W..._II?wprov=sfla1
This post has been edited by bananajoe: Sep 10 2021, 03:54 PM
wanted111who
post Sep 10 2021, 03:52 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
535 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(bananajoe @ Sep 10 2021, 11:37 AM)

*
Not wasting resources is better than spending resources invading, Thailand is puppet anyway. Japan tried to convince china to surrender as well in early 1930. Thailand is no different than manchuko. Thailand gunboat was operated to help Japan , as transport ship.

emburrar
post Sep 10 2021, 03:54 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
14 posts

Joined: Oct 2014
From: Bandar Damai dan Indah


U help me i help u
sportivo
post Sep 10 2021, 03:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
64 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(Sycamore @ Sep 10 2021, 03:37 PM)
Tell me what do you know.
*
in the eyes of the western power aka victors, Siam is an allies to the defeated Imperial Japan thus General MacArthur demanded Siam junta dictator General Plaek Phibunsongkhram to reformed Siam and renamed to Thailand with CIA backing.
btw Phibun saved the Siam monarchy from CIA intention to turn Thailand into a republic due to Siam and Imperial Japan closed relationship.

This post has been edited by sportivo: Sep 10 2021, 04:07 PM
sportivo
post Sep 10 2021, 04:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
64 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
Victor rewrite history of Thailand and manipulated her governing affairs.
similar to Victor manipulated and rewrite the history of Indonesia after WW2 particularly CIA project on the fate of Sukarno….

QUOTE(bananajoe @ Sep 10 2021, 03:45 PM)
Name change was done before WW2
*
QUOTE(bananajoe @ Sep 10 2021, 03:50 PM)
Not sure where you got that info but Japan actually invade first. And at the same time, There was a coup and new regime that favours japanese came to power. You can read it up in wiki.
*
K.I.T.T
post Sep 10 2021, 04:12 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
672 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(bananajoe @ Sep 10 2021, 11:37 AM)

*
Thailand sakit hati dgn british sebab
perlu serahkan Kedah Perak terengganu Kelantan
pada british. Perjanjian Inggeris - Siam 1909 adalah bukti.
kalau Jepun boleh halau British keluar
Thailand boleh claim balik 4 Negeri Melayu.

tapi thailand x dapat buat apa2 sebab lepas Jepun
surrender British balik ke Malaya. lepas tu bagi Malaya Merdeka.

Perjanjian Inggeris - Siam 1909 adalah asal usul kenapa
Patani boleh dapat pada Thailand sampai sekarang
perjanjian inggeris siam di buat tanpa persetujuan raja melayu.

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0249sec    0.48    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 03:21 AM