Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Why Japan Didnt invade thailand in ww2 ?, This is interesting to learn

views
     
wanted111who
post Sep 10 2021, 03:52 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
535 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(bananajoe @ Sep 10 2021, 11:37 AM)

*
Not wasting resources is better than spending resources invading, Thailand is puppet anyway. Japan tried to convince china to surrender as well in early 1930. Thailand is no different than manchuko. Thailand gunboat was operated to help Japan , as transport ship.

wanted111who
post Sep 10 2021, 04:42 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
535 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(empyreal @ Sep 10 2021, 01:24 PM)
Thai wasnt neutral - they were part of the axis.

The only reason the uk didnt attack thailand was because the us said enough, so the thai had to give back the territories plus war reparations.
*
I think allies do not have resources to spare for Thailand,
US go for Okinawa directly instead of south east asia after they regain Philippines. After few too many ship lost / damaged to kamikaze, they need atom bomb which they reluctant to use in the beginning.

Uk can't even spare resources during malaya bintang 3 rebellion and need to hasten up our independent. They relinquish many territories due to risk of uprising and strong local nationalist movements.

Country that tried to resist like France in Vietnam, Dutch in Indonesia were defeated by local. Japanese occupation help people understand, no imperial is good, they need to fight.

This post has been edited by wanted111who: Sep 10 2021, 04:43 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0167sec    0.81    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 02:25 PM