QUOTE(zeng @ Apr 21 2021, 10:49 AM)
Thank you for clarifying that Yaris Rear is a non-adjustable Torsion Beam.
Assuming after-market parts are not available for Rear adjustment in this torsion beam, in your assessment can locally made eccentric bolts and/or shims (by local specialised machining shops) be resorted to by those mati-mati mod kakis, to achieve say zero thrust angle at Rear?? Just curious.
Unaware that TS did mention about highway driving and floating phenomenon in the OP, and your mentioning of desirability of toe in at Front , this is exactly what TS can do to alleviate (if not fully resolve) his 'problem' at hand.
Add: By making TS as is (factory set) toe angles more positive aka more toe-in.
Imo, anti roll bars or its replacement/mod has no role in whatever form in the TS current problem of floating at highway straight ahead driving.
Seriously I don't know, at least I never seen one. But I never search hard, I'm not their target customer anyways. I'm sure you know eccentric bolt can make McPherson struct a little bit of camber adjustment. Another example is Ferrari 488, the front double wishbone is not designed to be adjustable (I think), but since the pivot of arms are just bolted to the chassis, people simply add washer to change the camber.
Torsion Beam the wheel bearing is on structure itself, not sure (someone mentioned it can be bent, in other topic). But from my experience of the limited cars I own/owned, the limitation is space if we were to add structure. Also even multilink, double wishbone, not all are created equally.
1) This is Elantra Sport multilink. The non sport version has torsion beam and full size spare tires, while the Sport have space saver because the multilink taken more space.
This is typical multilink on the econobox chassis adapted to sport sedan, 4 arms (1 of them is trailing arm). Civic has same design. Again, not all multilinks are created equal, this of course has less degree of freedom vs the 5 fully adjustable links on a pure sport car
As you can see only arm 1 and arm 2 are adjustable. They both affect toe and camber. So this depends of the experiences of the tire shop to balance the 2 arms.
Arm 4 is blocked in this view, and non adjustable. But you may in theory replace it with an aftermarket adjustable rod. Same for double wishbone, the A shape arm can be replaced with 2 adjustable rod (in modern BMW, the A of lower arm has become 2 separated arms). I don't know torsion beam has the luxury, or is it even possible?

2) This is Volvo S60. It is common design for all the SPA platform, SUVs have same design.
As you can see, only arm 1 is adjustable. It is primary for toe, but inevitable it would affect camber slightly.
Arm 2 is kinda like lower arm of double wishbone, but as one giant flat structure (imagine you fill in space of a char A) for aerodynamic, and it is also the same arm air suspension sitting on for model with air suspension. You can in theory, replace this with 2 adjustable rods, with some CNC machining needed for mounting structure.
Then arm 3 is one of the support arm and also the spring itself. The called is transverse leaf composite spring, because it is single spring the across the chassis. This save a lot of space for flat wide trunk.
Arm 4 can be replaced with adjustable rod.

3) 488 Front upper arm of the double wishbone, bottom have same design. You can see the whole pivot structure is bolted, adding washer will move it away from the chassis, thus changing the camber, so it is matter number of washer at upper vs lower. Most passenger cars, the pivot points are part of the chassis, we can not do the same hack.
P/S: Borrowing this idea, how is the wheel bearing mounted on the torsion beam. Any potential to add washer? I don't know, hahaha
This post has been edited by constant_weight: Apr 21 2021, 01:07 PM