but i read the specs, all others tat aint 100hz is actually 120hz ler

which lcd model u using ?

From what I have gathered so far, (correct me if I am wrong)

Those LCD TV which can input 24p is not that useful unless the TV set itself support 120Hz. That's because in order for smooth judder free video, the frequency must be in multiples of 24  ...  e.g 24, 48,..... 96 or 120hz,  for perfect synchronization. Otherwise, even if the TV can input 24p, it will still have to do some sort of pulldown technique.

Currently those TV which claim can input 24P but does not have 120hz frequency is just marketing hype. It's akin to those TV which claim can input 1080P signal but the panel itself is only 1366x768 resolution.

I think you have mixed up what we were discussing. We are discussing one thing and you are talking about another.

My point is , If you want to input 24p then the best combination  is with a 120Hz TV.

On A 100Hz TV which can input 24P, there will still be judder because of the uneven match (24p can't be multiplied to exactly match 100Hz frequency) . It will have to use some sort of technique to fill in the missing frames. How well the manufacturer implements the technique will determine how smooth the video will be.

On the other hand , if you have 120Hz TV which can input also input  24P signals,  it won't have to do any pulldown because it just multiply the 24 by 5 times.

btw, I only mentioned the topic of  1080P input on a panel with resolution of 768 just to show an example of  how people are sometimes misled into believing that any panel which can input 1080P signal is automatically a Full HD Panel itself.

Just like how people are misled that just because  the TV can input 24P , it will automatically have the optimal  frequency to handle the signal smoothly.

The two examples are not meant to be related, other than the fact that they are sometimes used to mislead people for marketing purposes.

i'm looking for 32" lcd tv for gaming and movie purpose, need advise on which lcd produce most quality images on screen for xbox360. a promoter suggest the jvc LT-32EX77 which has those blur reduction capability, and other thn that he also suggest the samsung r8 series which forummer here have mix opnion about samsung.

wht i am aiming for lcd tvs are, gaming xbox360. movie might come second as i can't diffrentiate btwn watching movies in sd and hd. a vga connection,hdmi and clear picture is a must. pls advise. thank you.

WTF - !! belum lagi habis ngan 3:2 pull down - now datang pulak 5:5 pull down. anbelivebel!

ask them match no use de..must lower le..

as u post in somewhere ...u said u buy 2.5k rite?
my price is lower than them lo...haha 

y dun u buy from me...lol...

Hi!

Just brought Sharp 32 A53M... so far ok the quality.. but due to my old dvd player.. i can't attached the HDMI cable.. so PQ is abit down.. got noise.. colour still ok.. the sales person advice me to buy component cable... (RGB) to have better vision...

So is it true if i add in component cable it will improve the PQ? How much it cost ar...?

yau mou ar adrian, that day we tested between rm 11 RCA cable and Monster Svideo on astro- kinda of 20-30% ++ diff , dont compare with rm20 s video cable  in term of colour density and noise level.....u might wan to drop by to midvalley this week at mid ground flr coz we doing that testing thing with the diff between hdmi upscaling dvd and rca for da same dvd movie....

icdeadppl...u buy liao lcd?