Hi,

My friend sold his house recently and pass a crossed photocopy of NRIC to the lawyer to do title transfer. The transfer got rejected and the reason being given is it is not clear without saying what is not clear. His lawyer resubmitted the photocopied NRIC with just the lawyer firm rubber stamp on it, and the title transfer went through.

I just wonder a company rubber stamp will be enough to safe guard it (without the for ...... use only) clause ?


Anyone has any idea on this ?

Thank you.

Face problem.

crossed out but got put for usage of what or not?

Sorry the rubber stamp not enough to safeguard.

Sorry the rubber is totally not enough,
Can misuse

no ler. just the lawyer firm stamp

Have any cases for example ?

crossed photocopy and write what?

Mine got rejected as well, but actually it was due to the a number couldn't be read from light reflection, not because cross out.

Make sure no important details are covered. Like photo or letters.

dun worry d lawyer oredi has thousands of photocopy ic of other pipu

U crossed but what's the note inside?

A company stamp is not a valid source to verify a document.

Rip ts gonna get chased by ah long

Some investment also dont accept NRIC with crossout usage why ?

I usually cross with note purpose and set transparent in Photoshop, so far never have an issue.

In Sabah, need the photocopy need to be verified by JPN. Asked the JPN wether need to cross, the officer said up to me, but he also doesn't encourage. Already submit to lawyer, waiting for land office response. But for loan, I did the crossing thingy, not rejected.

if u cross on the details like name, i/c number, address,.. of cos kena reject,..

very complicated.

we just ph cyber trooper only

First submission crossed with "For SPA of the said property unit only"

Second submission only with the lawyer firm rubber stamp on NRIC front and back. Wonder the lawyer firm stamp alone will be enough to safeguard it from being misused ?

First submission crossed with "For SPA of the said property unit only"

Second submission only with the lawyer firm rubber stamp on NRIC front and back. Wonder the lawyer firm stamp alone will be enough to safeguard it from being misused ?

First submission crossed with "For SPA of the said property unit only"

Second submission only with the lawyer firm rubber stamp on NRIC front and back. Wonder the lawyer firm stamp alone will be enough to safeguard it from being misused if it fall into the wrong hand ?

Im not sure about first one.

How convinced you are that law firm itself wont misuse your IC? There is a few person out there with their sight-certify accepted by Court. Notary Public for example. You shall dig your info here and ask Google next.

When you guys say “crossed with xxxx text” do you mean you write the xxxx over the photocopy IC itself? Or on the paper below/beside/above?

Normally I see ppl cross out "For land offices purposes only" or something to give permission for the land office of Malaysia to do stuff. Yours might be too narrow in scope.

For 2nd one... not sure..

What the point you crossing? Bodo

To avoid misuse if it fall into the wrong hand.

write something like "For xxxx use" over the photocopy IC.

Since we entrust the lawyer to act on our behalf, then we must trust the lawyer to a certain level of degree. Anywhere, anything can happen.
My main point is if the photocopy IC with just the lawyer firm stamp, fall into the wrong hand excluding the lawyer, can the wrong hand miuses it for other purpose since there is a lawyer firm stamp on it ?

No such things nowadays la

Zzzz

Yes.

Oh this cross bullshit actually need ah? Not sure which side korek.

I crossed my IC when purchasing my house. Ok jer.
You don't put cross in the middle until blocking any details.

Its ok at least your NRIC did not get rejected like me because of face problem all app face recognition software all reject me so in 2021 i cant register a single app that require NRIC.

really ar? I've submitted mortgage & loan applications before, all crossed; no issues.

but I was careful not to have the cross over the IC number and photo.

My old IC i think bangla from Maxis already got info so now i dont care about my IC no more

I write it over the photocopy IC, often over the name or number just to be safe. No problem so far. If you don’t write over, it defeats the purpose. The whole photocopy can be photocopied again ...

Gib the real ic

Damn, all my life I’ve been doing it wrong LOL
I draw one line over IC
Then write the details below, not ON the IC copy itself
🤦🏻‍♂️

if no cross properly also no use

Ya.. actually one line over IC does nothing... it can be photocopied again ( and block what you wrote beside) and reused with “one line over IC”...lol... but I guess one still need much more than a photocopy IC to cause much harm...still, just try to be safer

muka, name, no and address need to be clear lo.. ayam pernah query.. but if that is the case, then ur watermark or cross has no value. ayam can easily photoshop it onto a scan of another IC and just replace your identity and boom walla.

Ayam dun care simply becoz ayam poorfag and nobodi .. but who knows one day might need to plotek