Hi,

My friend sold his house recently and pass a crossed photocopy of NRIC to the lawyer to do title transfer. The transfer got rejected and the reason being given is it is not clear without saying what is not clear. His lawyer resubmitted the photocopied NRIC with just the lawyer firm rubber stamp on it, and the title transfer went through.

I just wonder a company rubber stamp will be enough to safe guard it (without the for ...... use only) clause ?


Anyone has any idea on this ?

Thank you.

Face problem.

crossed out but got put for usage of what or not?

Sorry the rubber stamp not enough to safeguard.

Sorry the rubber is totally not enough,
Can misuse

no ler. just the lawyer firm stamp

Have any cases for example ?

crossed photocopy and write what?

Mine got rejected as well, but actually it was due to the a number couldn't be read from light reflection, not because cross out.

Make sure no important details are covered. Like photo or letters.

dun worry d lawyer oredi has thousands of photocopy ic of other pipu

U crossed but what's the note inside?

A company stamp is not a valid source to verify a document.

Rip ts gonna get chased by ah long

Some investment also dont accept NRIC with crossout usage why ?

I usually cross with note purpose and set transparent in Photoshop, so far never have an issue.

In Sabah, need the photocopy need to be verified by JPN. Asked the JPN wether need to cross, the officer said up to me, but he also doesn't encourage. Already submit to lawyer, waiting for land office response. But for loan, I did the crossing thingy, not rejected.

if u cross on the details like name, i/c number, address,.. of cos kena reject,..

very complicated.

we just ph cyber trooper only

First submission crossed with "For SPA of the said property unit only"

Second submission only with the lawyer firm rubber stamp on NRIC front and back. Wonder the lawyer firm stamp alone will be enough to safeguard it from being misused ?