added regulations

resolution = 1280X1024


CINEBENCH R10
****************************************************

Tester : Jinaun

Processor : Intel(R) Core™2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
MHz : 2400
Number of CPUs : 4
Operating System : WINDOWS 64 BIT 6.0.6000

Graphics Card : Radeon X1950 Series
Resolution : 1680x1050
Color Depth : 32bit

****************************************************

Rendering (Single CPU): 2761 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 9637 CB-CPU

Multiprocessor Speedup: 3.49

Shading (OpenGL Standard) : 4303 CB-GFX


****************************************************

To benchmark and submit results, visit this site http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/697/Cinebench_v10.html

==================
running on default benchmark settings

This post has been edited by DaRkSyThE: Aug 19 2007, 01:51 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)

CINEBENCH R10
****************************************************

Tester : -pWs-

Processor : AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3600+
MHz : 2850MHz
Number of CPUs : 2
Operating System : WINDOWS 32 BIT 5.1.2600

Graphics Card : GeForce 7900 GS/PCI/SSE2/3DNOW!
Resolution : 1280x1024
Color Depth : 32bit

****************************************************

Rendering (Single CPU): 2318 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 4535 CB-CPU

Multiprocessor Speedup: 1.96

Shading (OpenGL Standard) : 3539 CB-GFX


****************************************************


-pWs-

This post has been edited by -pWs-: Aug 17 2007, 09:52 PM

maybe we could standardize the resolution?

yes.. what reso is recommended? 1024x768?
//edit//

maybe we should put away with pix.. and just past from clipboard...

---

Added on August 17, 2007, 10:40 pmhmm.. it seems that the performance almost double 1.96, its very close to 2.0 for dual core

mine is onli 3.49 over 4 for quad core.. perhaps becoz the 2 pairs of cores have to communicate over the FSB

This post has been edited by jinaun: Aug 17 2007, 10:51 PM

Yea. Should be like that.
When running benchmark, wait like stupid ppl

-pWs-

CINEBENCH R10
****************************************************

Tester :

Processor : Intel® Core™2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
MHz : 3114Mhz
Number of CPUs : 2
Operating System : WINDOWS 32 BIT 6.0.6000

Graphics Card : GeForce 8800 GTX/PCI/SSE2
Resolution : 1680x1050
Color Depth : 32-bit

****************************************************

Rendering (Single CPU): --- CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 5986 CB-CPU


Shading (OpenGL Standard) : 3917 CB-GFX


****************************************************

CINEBENCH R10
****************************************************

Tester : SoonSing

Processor : Intel® Pentium® D CPU 2.66GHz
MHz : 3.50Ghz
Number of CPUs : 2
Operating System : WINDOWS 32 BIT 6.0.6000

Graphics Card : Radeon X1300/X1550 Series
Resolution : <1024x768>
Color Depth : <32bit>

****************************************************

Rendering (Single CPU): 1836 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 2937 CB-CPU

Multiprocessor Speedup: 1.60

Shading (OpenGL Standard) : 1730 CB-GFX


****************************************************


forget to printscreen...haaha...
but how come my speedup so low?..any idea?
sorry for the low end gpu..

the reason for your slow speedup is you are using Pentuim D (2 die in a processor packaging where interdie communicate through the FSB)

i don;t think GPU is an issue here, cinebench are more cpu/memory/NB intensive

This post has been edited by jinaun: Aug 19 2007, 10:39 AM

Mine :

CINEBENCH R10
****************************************************

Tester : AhPauL

Processor : Intel® Core™2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
MHz : 3200MHz
Number of CPUs : 2
Operating System : WINDOWS 32 BIT 5.1.2600

Graphics Card : Radeon X1950 Series x86/SSE2
Resolution : 1680x1050
Color Depth : 32bit

****************************************************

Rendering (Single CPU): 3216 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 5898 CB-CPU

Multiprocessor Speedup: 1.83

Shading (OpenGL Standard) : 5186 CB-GFX


****************************************************





My SHADING quite high but CPU speedup slow ?

high shading probably due to OC GPU? or drivers.

the ideal speedup factor is near to 2.0 for dual core and near to 4.0 for quadcores (at least in theory), cache trashing is probably the cause(?) of lower speedup factor. or maybe some other cumulative factors. but it seems that AMD X2 are more nearer to the ideal 2.0(more efficient intercore communication) compared to core2duo based on the results gathered here so far.

This post has been edited by jinaun: Aug 19 2007, 08:15 PM

i didn't OC my VGA at all, running @ default speed,
i guess is the latest driver cause it ... ?

ya,
i remember last time when i used X2 939,
the CPU speedup is 1.9x,
now using C2D only able to get 1.8x...

AMD tech still the best i guess ?

UPDATES

CINEBENCH R10
****************************************************

Tester : ID
Processor : Intel(R) Core(tm)2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz
MHz : 3600
Number of CPUs : 2
Operating System : WINDOWS 32 BIT 5.1.2600

Graphics Card : Radeon HD 2600XT DDR4 Series
Resolution : 1280x1024
Color Depth : 32bit

****************************************************

Rendering (Single CPU): 3650 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 6856 CB-CPU

Multiprocessor Speedup: 1.88x

Shading (OpenGL Standard): 6086 CB-GFX


****************************************************



This post has been edited by id86: Aug 20 2007, 08:37 PM

guys, how to change the reso to 1280x1024? coz default is 800x600 rite?

Here is mine:

CINEBENCH R10
****************************************************

Tester : RokXIII

Processor : Intel® Core™2 CPU 6300 @ 1.86GHz
MHz : 2870
Number of CPUs : 2
Operating System : WINDOWS 32 BIT 6.0.6000

Graphics Card : GeForce 7600 GT/PCI/SSE2
Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bit

****************************************************

Rendering (Single CPU): 2860 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 5380 CB-CPU

Multiprocessor Speedup: 1.88

Shading (OpenGL Standard) : 3839 CB-GFX


****************************************************

i don't think u can, i can't any options either, i think what DaRkSyThE referring to is the screen capture resolution/desktop resolution, cinebench will still render in 800x600 window

This post has been edited by jinaun: Aug 20 2007, 10:28 PM

CINEBENCH R10
****************************************************

Tester : gengstapo

Processor : Intel(R) Core(tm)2 Quad 6600
MHz : 3204
Number of CPUs : 4
Operating System : WINDOWS XP Pro SP2

Graphics Card : Radeon X1900XTX
Resolution : 1280 x 1024
Color Depth : 32 bit

****************************************************

Rendering (Single CPU): 3294 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 11601 CB-CPU

Multiprocessor Speedup: 3.52x

Shading (OpenGL Standard) : 6130 CB-GFX


****************************************************

Looking at the scores, it seems that for core2 duo the score figure is almost the same as the clock speed, it behaves linearly. So from there you can derive a comparison of performance how many GHz of single core you need in order to beat the quad in terms of multiple rendering. Almost Impossible I would say.

wad is Cinebench actually? a kind of benchmarking software? juz like 3dmark ah?

helo? no body can answer my question? reli dunno wad is cinebench

aiyoo bro, why never try find it urself instead of waiting ppl answer

u can search more about it when u used google