QUOTE(Nomisma @ Nov 15 2020, 08:54 AM)
Malaysia, at least Sarawak have another option: Hydrogen. They have absolutely MASSIVE amount of hydrogen potential cheaper than almost anyone on earth.Here's why X50 3-cylinder engine is better than 4
Here's why X50 3-cylinder engine is better than 4
|
|
Nov 15 2020, 05:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,831 posts Joined: Jun 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2020, 05:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,831 posts Joined: Jun 2017 |
QUOTE(Nomisma @ Nov 15 2020, 09:18 AM) which is why the 10 years gap. remember how android phones was 10 years ago? compared to it's norm today? Sarawak starting to have hybrid station. Petrol. Hydrogen. Electric.china nowadays already produce electric cars with very close competition to tesla. soon, Geely will mass produce them too & be exported to our country. japanis cars still playing catch up.. toyota going the hydrogen route.. the infras will eventually come when petrol stations are losing customer to electic cars. petrol stations will have to be phased out / revolutionized to be electic car charger too. Sarawak have massive hydrogen potential. |
|
|
Nov 15 2020, 05:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,831 posts Joined: Jun 2017 |
Malaysian are funny.
X70 engine nothing much to do with Volvo and people claim it's Volvo and many go buy X50 engine have much more to do with Volvo and people bash like hell. So do people like Volvo or not? |
|
|
Nov 15 2020, 09:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,831 posts Joined: Jun 2017 |
Turbo charger merely forces more air/oxygen into the combustion chamber to create more complete fuel combustion, aka, increase fuel efficiency. Increased fuel efficiency equates to more power.
The other alternative, if you want the same power, is to have a bigger engine. Bigger engine, even more fuel used than a turbo charged engine of similar power output. |
|
|
Nov 16 2020, 03:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,831 posts Joined: Jun 2017 |
QUOTE(dares @ Nov 15 2020, 03:41 PM) Turbo is for expensive cars that owners don't care about fuel economy Obviously, those small turbo made for economy cars are not the same as big turbos/twinturbos/biturbos/quadturbos you find on luxury cars. Many people wanted more power and turbocharging is a CHEAPER ways to get those extra power. Ever wondered why there are so many turbo charged diesel pickup in Malaysia? |
|
|
Nov 16 2020, 04:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,831 posts Joined: Jun 2017 |
QUOTE(dares @ Nov 16 2020, 09:01 AM) Read carefully, the bolded part is what the other ktards said, the unbolded part is my reply to those allegations. Basically I am in agreement with you. Yes, there are people who know nothing about turbocharging and talk nonsense. I think with turbocharging, you uses 10% more fuel but get 20+% more power. I don't have the exact figures. |
| Change to: | 0.0139sec
0.66
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 03:38 PM |