Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Here's why X50 3-cylinder engine is better than 4

views
     
Eskape
post Nov 15 2020, 06:26 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Mar 2016
QUOTE(lurkingaround @ Nov 15 2020, 06:17 PM)
Afaik;

Why Proton's X50 SUV, a quite heavy car, has only a Turbo 1.5 liter 3-cylinder engine and not a non-Turbo/normal-aspirated 2.0l 4-cylinder engine.? = for Proton to save on manufacturing costs by putting a smaller 1.5l engine in the X50, at the expense of the customers having to spend more money on higher fuel consumption, especially with slower turbo-city-driving.

Turbo = an additional small motor to deliver compressed air into the smaller 1.5l engine = more power(= as powerful as a non-turbo 2.0l engine) but also uses more fuel.
.

In the old days(= pre-2010), you mostly only find turbo-chargers in luxury sports-cars like Porshe and Ferrari, used by rich daddy-kasi playboys as chick-magnets. The playboys did not mind paying more for fuel for the faster turbo-speed and/or bigger capacity engine for the small-sized sports-cars.
.
*
Wait... I think there's something the wrong way round here. Turbo chargers are designed to improve efficiency of the engine. Same power output can be achieved by a smaller displacement engine through the use of turbochargers. Smaller displacement = less fuel used to fire the cylinders. Turbochargers don't need fuel to be injected into it.

The whole higher fuel consumption perception is because of driving style. People with turbochargers tend to put their foot down more.
Eskape
post Nov 15 2020, 07:44 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Mar 2016
QUOTE(lurkingaround @ Nov 15 2020, 06:44 PM)
.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-drive...rticle29705614/ - The trouble with turbos: Why fuel economy can be worse, not better - 22 April 2016

https://carbuzz.com/features/this-is-why-tu...conomy-is-a-lie - This Is Why Turbocharged Fuel Economy Is A Lie
Jan 30, 2018 by Roger Biermann Opinion

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aO2vC_iMTI - Why Small Turbo Engines Are Not Efficient - 1,191,446 views - Aug 1, 2018
.
*
Global Mail article: "that efficiency can quickly disappear if you don't drive with discipline. A turbocharged engine turns into a fuel-hog under hard acceleration"

Carbuzz article: "Under medium-to-high loads, when a turbocharger is active, the engine responds by sending in extra fuel for maximum torque and power production. Extra fuel = worse fuel economy"

Youtube: Basically explaining why if you put your foot down, fuel economy worsens.

All links are saying that if you want to achieve the maximum power rate, your fuel economy worsens. Which all leads back to putting your foot down = worse fuel economy.


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0132sec    0.70    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 05:40 PM