Nov 7 2020, 02:46 PM, updated 5y ago
QUOTE
Problem is, the existing malay agenda policies have been abused to benefit only the rich and connected malays. Coz its not a poor malay policy. Its just simply, malay policy. That means any malay can benefit from it. And this only benefts the rich and connected malays. You poor kampung & B40 malays with no connections should just be grateful enough to get some crumbs.
Why can't we have a more equitable needs based policy? That way every poor Malaysian can get help. I mean, come on man, you really think there are no poor chinese or poor indians or any other races ka, or is it they don't deserve help eventhough they are Malaysian citizens? With needs based policies, only the truly needy gets help instead of the rich and connected ones.
A simple illustration:
1. Assuming a population of 100, and 10 of them are poor.
2. Out of the 10 poors, you have 5 malays, 3 indians, 2 chinese. (This is just an arbitrary figure for illustration purpose ya, pls dont get your panties into a knot)
3. There are enough resources to help 10 poor ppl
4. With the existing malay agenda, 9 resources benefits the rich malays. Only 1 resource is spread to help the 5 poor malays. The rest can go dai.
5. With needs based agenda, all 10 resources must go to the 10 poor ppl.
Ofc, this is an overly simplistic view and needs based agendas can still be open to abuse, but it definitely is better than the existing malay agenda however you look at it.
Why can't we have a more equitable needs based policy? That way every poor Malaysian can get help. I mean, come on man, you really think there are no poor chinese or poor indians or any other races ka, or is it they don't deserve help eventhough they are Malaysian citizens? With needs based policies, only the truly needy gets help instead of the rich and connected ones.
A simple illustration:
1. Assuming a population of 100, and 10 of them are poor.
2. Out of the 10 poors, you have 5 malays, 3 indians, 2 chinese. (This is just an arbitrary figure for illustration purpose ya, pls dont get your panties into a knot)
3. There are enough resources to help 10 poor ppl
4. With the existing malay agenda, 9 resources benefits the rich malays. Only 1 resource is spread to help the 5 poor malays. The rest can go dai.
5. With needs based agenda, all 10 resources must go to the 10 poor ppl.
Ofc, this is an overly simplistic view and needs based agendas can still be open to abuse, but it definitely is better than the existing malay agenda however you look at it.
Prove me wrong, change my mind
Quote
0.0231sec
0.67
5 queries
GZIP Disabled