Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 phone supported sound, 24-bit/192kHz vs 32-bit/384kHz

views
     
Hattori
post Sep 10 2020, 08:56 PM

(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
******
Senior Member
1,186 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
QUOTE(Yggdrasil @ Sep 10 2020, 08:53 PM)
Isn't human hearing range only 20Hz to 20kHz?
You mean kbps?
*
Then CD is pointless since they are 44.1kHz ?

https://sound.stackexchange.com/questions/2...hing-at-44-1khz
Hattori
post Sep 10 2020, 09:35 PM

(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
******
Senior Member
1,186 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
High sampling rates does have some effect.

For hearing, it can be noticeable when used with EQ to bring out some of the frequency details.
I tried on lower sampling rates and the sound comes out muffled due to lack of resolution like attempting to enhance a pixelated censor image.

Other than hearing for ears, sound does have effect on other senses when it makes your skin prickle/crawl, hair raising sensations or stomach thump on frequencies below or above human hearing range.


Hattori
post Sep 10 2020, 10:38 PM

(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
******
Senior Member
1,186 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
Done the test using Koss KSC-75 ear clips connected to my 15 years old AthlonX64 PC's front panel without using any EQ settings.

Got 4 out of 6 correct, which is not by guessing.

I could hear the wideness echo of the soundstage and less muffled instruments on the uncompressed WAV files compared to the other 2 samples, except for the 2 songs I got wrong by actually guessing due to the loudness of the music that drowns out these mentioned effects.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0139sec    0.62    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 08:54 AM