Ken Rimba is G&G with individual title right? So basically it is just as good as F&G not like strata title G&G, isn't it?

Correct me if I am wrong. I am just a noob started to read about all this for the past 1 year only.

Don't take my answer 100%, but from my readings, F&G is normally a term that people use for new development that the developer provides all the fencing and guard house but still under individual title. I think in this case owner are not obliged to pay the "maintenance fees". G&G is gated and guarded with strata title, management can bring you to court if you don't pay the maintenance fees.

That’s why most developer now are setting up F&G infrastructure to newer development for individual title since normally the initial setting up costs are the expensive part where house owners are not willing to fork out. When the market them as F&G, most of owners will be aware that there will be some future fees that they need to pay in order to maintain the security arrangement. But there will always be people who are big headed and will argue that since it is and individual title, he isn’t obliged to pay.