E6x50 overclocking warning, Possible wrong core temperature reading!
E6x50 overclocking warning, Possible wrong core temperature reading!
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
hm... i juz played around wif Celeron 420 on customer's new order... seems very cool on Gigabyte GA-945GCMX-S2... i did't check the temp but the fan rarely spin and the sink is cool...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 07:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
QUOTE(remysix @ Aug 1 2007, 05:35 PM) it is due to G0 stepping or 1333Mhz proc? Q6600 is 266FSB proc... tat's y... anyone with Q6600 with G0 stepping, pls reportn in... my Q6600 is showing Tjunction of 100c and the the VID is 1.275v...sweet...but it's not G0...it's B3 though seems like G0 is a reject to all OC'ers... |
|
|
Aug 6 2007, 07:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
QUOTE(Mr.Lonely @ Aug 4 2007, 09:18 PM) acordding to asus PC probe , vcore is 1.46 wow.... so high..... now only i notice closed casing and stock cooler... the temp something over 60C if i playing game coz the 8800GTS heat up the proc.... *juz kidding... |
|
|
Aug 18 2007, 01:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
QUOTE(§layerXT @ Aug 8 2007, 01:42 PM) This is wat i found bout G1... something's not rite bout tat stepping... |
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 09:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
QUOTE(kmarc @ Aug 18 2007, 08:39 AM) i tested my shop customer's E6550 & E6750... i gotta say... they are fast... but not cool... |
|
|
Aug 21 2007, 01:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
QUOTE(kmarc @ Aug 19 2007, 11:07 AM) Errr..... can you give a more "concrete" proof rather than the heatsink is "not cool"? Rather subjective, don't you think? Maybe an Intel's TAT reading or "Delta to Tjunction" on Core temp 0.95? err... 33 on core temp... concrete enough...?where can i get a thermometer which is good for measuring the heatsink temp....? |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 24 2007, 01:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
QUOTE(kmarc @ Aug 21 2007, 03:18 PM) No no. What I mean is objective proof when you say the E6300 is cooler in temperature as compared to the E6550 or E6750 - both idle and load temperature...... Try to use core temp 0.95 "Delta to Tjunction" to compare them.... yeah... i know... average temps for E4*00 & E6*00 series are 50-60... while E6*50 is around 30+... tat's juz 2 weird... i need to get a thermometer to confirm this... I've been playing wif these processors while assembling rigs for my shop's customers so I know it...But i can tell u tat Celeron 420 is the coolest of all procs... the sink is so cute and fan seldom turns if u enable smart fan control... and the sinks are still not hot... This post has been edited by t3chn0m4nc3r: Aug 24 2007, 01:08 AM |
|
|
Aug 26 2007, 01:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
|
|
|
Aug 26 2007, 10:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
|
|
|
Aug 28 2007, 07:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
QUOTE(kmarc @ Aug 27 2007, 11:56 PM) Hmm... that's weird. Did you enable EIST and C1E in BIOS? Your multipler is at 6x so this means that your rig is idling in EIST mode. However, not too sure why easytuner is not showing it. can't ur FSB go higher...? Run an orthos program and see whether the multiplier becomes 8x and the speed becomes 2.66Ghz. If it does, then the EIST is functioning. Yeah, 3.5Ghz stable, and running EIST too!!! |
|
|
Aug 29 2007, 08:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
QUOTE(kmarc @ Aug 29 2007, 08:30 AM) Don't want to run my bus speed that high. Anyway, my CPU fsb wall is apparently at 480mhz. At 8x multiplier, I can't even reach that speed without increasing my vcore. my vCore is around 1.4something only... not 1.5 yet... no guts to venture tat high on air-cooling... not prepared for WC also... Anyway, not planning to OC my CPU higher than that 24/7 as I want my rig to last longer.... |
|
|
Aug 30 2007, 07:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
QUOTE(kmarc @ Aug 30 2007, 05:44 PM) OIC. In general, the understanding is that for good air-cooling, you can safely OC the CPU +0.10v to +0.15v for 24/7 usage. So, for a 1.35v stock vcore, that would be 1.45v-1.50v. ooo... for me i keep my RAM 2V and below... However, for me, I usually run at a bit lower than the recommended value. Hence, my CPU is at 1.425v (BIOS setting) and my rams are at 2.1v...... |
|
|
Sep 12 2007, 05:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
|
| Change to: | 0.0244sec
0.24
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 02:11 AM |