Nice. What's the vcore at that speed?

No need to wonder la, OC it higher!!!

1.344V according to CPU-Z.. but if my memory doesn't fail me, i had set it @ 1.425v, just like your's..

quite true.. the most just reset BIOS right?

aiming for 4ghz, but then that's too ambitious. haha.. on factory heatsink leh..

very very hard to push 4ghz with stock cooling since 4ghz need min 1.575 vcore to reach.stable almost 1.6vcore brother....water cooling is more suatable.my noctua with ac fan mod can make it.full load will nop over 68c now.nice work.kekeke
will go in WC soon to more oc later

This post has been edited by Vtec(Rock): Sep 2 2007, 10:57 AM

hehe.. i'm not a hardcore OC-er so i won't go to the extreme.. doing this just for fun.. saw you reached 13.xxxs for SuperPI.. i only managed 14.xxxs.. haha.. will try pushing it a lil more. maybe, say.. 3.8ghz?

WC is nice but the maintainence..

i already reach 12.409.kekekeke....at 515x8.

wah gila sial. i could only dream. my only wish is to reach 13.xxx, after that i'm happy liao..

check my pass screen shoot.1.6vcore.515x8......

With the most value mobo on market good luck

goldfries seem to get good results wif his Biostar... hope he won goldfry his mobo...

Next time when new generation cpu come will get cheap powerful mobo than expensive one.

my proc is 20'C using coretemp 0.95 at idle and 22'C using intel TAT....
using ttbt vx....

Wah, so long didn't see this thread.

Anyway, I don't think the problem was ever corrected. Never looked into it anymore.

Most apps (I think) has corrected the Tjunction to 100'c (dunnot correct or not).

Try coretemp 0.95.4...... it's better to believe the higher temperature rather than the lower one if you're overclocking, I guess.....

This thread will be heat up again with new wolfdale later

when i use coretemp 0.95.4, it shows 35-36'C at idle....
maybe it has been corrected the Tjunction to 100'c...

LOL.. his model is sold out all over LYP... I guess the LYN effect strikes again

This post has been edited by wodenus: Nov 4 2007, 10:14 PM

Core Temp 0.95.4 Beta shows the real temp for your CPU cores as far as I'm concern. It has the same value when using Everest Ultimate for the cores. The 0.95 version have to add 15C to the cores' temperature to get a real reading. The bad thing is the 0.95.4 version is still a Beta version and is not stable for some system.

I actually pmed the author of Core Temp. He told me that the Tjunction of these E6x50 series is actually not known. It was assumed that it was 100'c. No hard info from Intel.

Anyway, since everybody is following this, I guess we have to follow this value too i.e. Tjunction of 100'c. Currently, I'm also using core temp 0.95.4 to measure the core temperature.....

Yeah, although it crashes sometimes when I run it on my system. But, it does provide readings same as Everest Ultimate.