Yawn........

NOOOOOO!!!!!
EVERYTHING IN THE INTERNET HAS TO BE REAL
WIKIPEDIA is the TRUTH that everyone is seeking
HARBO HOTEL is BASED on the real hotel in HARBOLAND
GOVERNMENT controls public by using the UNREGISTERED WIMAX BANDWITH

ITS TRUEEEEE!!!!!!

remember, numbers cant be copyrighted, Nvidia has 8500 series cards, as well as ATI, remember the old Radeon 8500? did that stop Nvidia from using the same number? no! so whats wrong with using 9800GTX?

and u, since ure soo convinced this is FAKE, please provide sources, dont need to 'degrade' others just because they're arent as well informed as u, what we know now is that no one has claimed this 'news' as to be genuine nor fake, its all a rumor and it stays at that. From quite alot of tech forums i've read about this specs, some say they're fake and most still unsure.

with this rumor, some people would 100% believe in it, this could cause low sales on the current 8800 series since November is only a few months away. Nvidia also aint saying anything

for all its worth, only time will tell, though i doubt this '9800 GTX' will get to show its face this year, since 8900GTX and 8950 is still nowhere in sight.

oh BTW, i aint no Nvidia fanboy, i'd just buy the best performing card, regardless of brand, lol.

This post has been edited by Xonius: Jul 27 2007, 07:52 PM

Everyone that posted actually do have a point, we should wait patiently till nov/dec.

Expected this, but not this soon. I was thinking middle of next year for Series 9 as even the 8900 GTX has not been released. Finally, anyone having a great machine coupled with this graphics card will be able to play games like "Flight Simulator X", "DiRT" as well as "Bioshock", "Crysis", "Alan Wake" and "Unreal Tournament 3" at high settings.

Whatever the name is, the performance will surely nearly double the 88GTX as nVidia promised.

Lucky thers no numbers wars.
Day one : Ati announce x18 Pro
Day two : Nvidia announces 22000 GS
Day 3 : Ati announce x9900XT
Day 4 : nvidia 888000 GTS
Day 5 : Ati x19M XTPE XTPS CT QE

What are you talking about?
no number war?

Crysis plays at high++ (probably Ultra high, as quoted) settings on a 8800GTS 320MB with an E6600 and 2GB of RAM.
This is quoted from the CEO of Crytek during one of PC Gamer UK's visits to their offices (or an interview from other sites)

Proper coding = little overhead. I await how UE3 titles will get past the performance gap since the big feature for DX10 on that engine would be AA (Not on UE3 DX9) and particle handling (AA's MUCH moar important, and that alone makes me shelve out twice the price for a DX10 card lol)



And for anyone trying to quote FLOPS numbers again, that alone is redundant.
W/O the die shrink the G80 design can't really go higher. Unless you want a superlength card.
And you think they'd give a die shrink to a .5 generation revision?

Unless ATi has unstoppable (think 8800GTS+ speeds @ RM700++) performance after RV670 balancing (I think it might have a chance, Crossfire would be epic WIN by using less power), nV won't focus on treating midrange users better. They'll probably just lower the prices of 8800s to makers, which will probably cut the board even less.

p/s: I'm not gonna pull numbers out of my ass or crediting/discrediting any source (except blatant sensationalist ones) when it comes to speculation. This feels sensationalist enough.

This post has been edited by X.E.D: Jul 27 2007, 10:22 PM

Sauce pls?

It's fake. And even in the event that those imaginary specs were true for some chip out there, that chip is not the G92. It's a bit too small to fit all that. Kthxbye.

yup..fishing time

LOL.
It's up to you either you want to believe it or not.
I have my sources, but i'm not going to reveal it here.
The only thing i can tell is that this news is FAKE.
You want to believe it, it's up to you, i can only LOL about it.

As for me and some others, we know this news is FAKE.

after they release this new chipset, it's time to buy 8800 ultra, cuz the price could be slashed up to 50%

ITS OVER ONE BILLLIONNNNNNNNNNNNNNN transistors

LOL! I think the card will be 3-feet long?

Yeah, dream on skin tube.

TS, mind to share ur source??? coz it ain't that much of a secret... we would like to understand more bout the whole story too so we can project our investment carefully...

i still think nvidia won't name it's big daddy card same as ati once top performer... if lower end then ain't much chaotic but u r talking bout the latest badest biggest card from nvidia wor...

Doesn't matter what the source is if it's fake.

I did do some searching and found that X-bit labs' Erik Larsson dating June 3rd, 2007 was the person that got the first details of the G92. He says "I have some info from Nvidia insider...". There are various forum postings from various websites and they all are linked to this particular X-bit labs source. Interestingly was the fact that Nvidia plans to transit to PCI Express 2.0 this fall.

Here are some links that might be useful:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/discussion/3953.html [Details of G92]
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/chipsets/disp...0601075512.html [PCI Express 2.0]
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/chipsets/disp...0525163505.html [Nvidia DirectX 10 IGP]

aiyooo.. 8 series pun tak mampu nak beli dh keluar baru..

And that's where TS got the info that you can find at the first page.
As said earlier, it's FAKE.