Don't be so naive bro...

First of all.... Exsim did not even announce any plans to develop "leisure" for the remaining land behind D'vervain...

if they are planning to do so.... they would have already announce it to attract buyers for the current projects...

it is most likely that they are planning to build a few more blocks of residential ...

No developers will ever "build leisure".... something that doesn't earn them money... AFTER all the current projects are sold.... the only time developers use the land for leisure is when they need to bundle it to attract and sell the existing residential projects...case in point... look at tropicana metropark...

Tropicana gardens vs empire damansara, obvious enough this comparison??

Tropicana gardens vs empire damansara, obvious enough this comparison??

So what makes you think exsim will treat empire damansara as its own first hand own child? You were the one who made a snide remark to compare both exsim and tropicana reputation.

When getting questioned now you say bad things are from mammoth, good things from exsim? Hahaha

First of all... I'm not questioning Exsim reputation and I'm not even comparing Tropicana and Exsim in terms of reputation...

I'm just using the master plan of "Tropicana Metropark" as an example of how a mixed development project typically looks like...

The fact that Exsim (based on available information from the developer website) did not declare any "leisure" projects for the remaining land would normally means that there is no intention of such development...

Just think about it for a moment... why would a developer waste its land to build a park or recreation area or for leisure purpose when there is no profit to it??

Tropicana Metropark has a huge recreational area being built is because it forms part and parcel with the existing residential plan to attract buyers..... it would make absolutely no sense if they have sold off Paisley/Pandora and Paloma THEN only announce that they want to build a park there....

Anyhow.... my comments on the "master plan" is purely a deduction based on preceding mixed development from other developers and common business sense....

You can just show the plan here... I don't need to meet with some stranger on the internet...

if you have something good to share... why not just share in the forum???

Is there something sketchy about the plan that you can't share it on the forum or are you afraid that people would crosscheck your so called "plan" with the developers??
seriously... this is the first time I've ever come across some plan for some project that has to be shared in private...

Hi everyone,

Did anyone noticed this before (see image), this is a screenshot of the Google Map: Terrain view. Why is that Google indicate the current Central Park Damansara site as two lakes? Or water bodies? Should follow up with checks

P.S. the topography of the Bukit Lanjan hill top is too sloping to have high rise residential. Maybe these are going to be low density residence like bungalow

It's free, use Google maps , then switch to terrain view. Google maps 3D view on desktop (or Google Earth app on phone) also gives you a 3D perspective of the terrain and topography.

Already discussed this before. Nothing has been confirmed yet. Everything is still in propose stage