QUOTE(Glau @ Jul 22 2007, 10:08 PM)
If the label is like that, then i think it is corsair's mistake.. This post has been edited by darnell: Jul 23 2007, 02:35 AM
corsair ram warning!, 667 is actually 533
|
|
Jul 23 2007, 02:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
583 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
|
| Change to: | 0.0153sec
0.94
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 02:33 PM |