Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Speedhome OR normal tenancy agreement?, Which one better and why?

views
     
AridEyes
post Apr 14 2021, 10:19 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
18 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
I would really advise against using speedhome as a landlord. No deposit means tenant can simply not pay utility bills and move out once their tenancy ended. Speedhome coverage is just not enough to cover this cost. As a result I lost 3k since speedhome insurance only can cover up to 1k. Tenant left without paying 4k electricity bill.

On the other hand, if you're a tenant looking for rental, I would recommend using speed home. You can rent without paying any utility bills, and simply move out once your tenancy has ended. Speedhome will not take any action on you, and you can just repeat this process as many times as you like.
AridEyes
post Apr 14 2021, 10:47 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
18 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(DragonReine @ Apr 14 2021, 10:40 AM)
4k?? shocking.gif What they do, bitcoin mining operation??

Speedhome got something to blacklist tenants like that hopefully? Otherwise the platform will be too easy to abuse.
*
Only 1 tenant is registered to speedhome, so if you're a couple or with a group of friends, you can reuse this abuse.
AridEyes
post Apr 17 2021, 06:20 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
18 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(ryan@chua @ Apr 16 2021, 09:51 PM)
You highlighted the good points.
But I checked through speedhome website, utility coverage up to 2k ?
*
Utilities fall under inconvenience benefit, which also includes any minor property damage. For basic (which what I had) is up to 1k, for extended and extended+ its up to 2k. My tenant had 4k electricity bills, still way above 2k.

Now if I were to use the traditional way of getting deposit, I would be getting 2 months rental + 1 month/1k (depends on agreement) to cover utilities, which would probably be able to cover the 4k + damages.


AridEyes
post Apr 18 2021, 01:14 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
18 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(wheimeng @ Apr 17 2021, 02:13 PM)
Just saw this, @arideyes - please reach out to our team, we have an internal policy to subsidize such incidents. The majority of the tenants do settle their bills by end of the tenancy.

If a tenant defaulted (not paying rental), most likely you can easily claim the same, if not more compared to deposit. And as mentioned, we do have an internal policy to help with rare cases such as yours.

I'll have a word with the team to update our SOP, I see areas of improvement to further mitigate such risks.

Feel free to reach out to me at ceo@speedhome.com if you have any other feedback, happy to discuss.
*
Thanks for the reply @wheimeng. I have reached out to your team and this is their response:

QUOTE
You will received RM1,000.00 for the claim of outstanding TNB bills and cleaning. Please take note, TNB bills and cleaning falls under inconvenience benefit section in the policy. Hence, the max payable is RM1,000.00.

Why aren't they adhering to the 'internal policy', if such exist?


AridEyes
post Apr 19 2021, 06:47 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
18 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
An update of my situation, @wheimeng has sorted out this issue for me. Apparently speedhome support team was trying to reach out to my wife (who was registered to speedhome) but she missed out the message and calls.

So today the support team reached out to me and they have agreed to cover 90% of the outstanding electricity bills. They actually can cover special cases like this.

Lesson learnt, for landlord the best option is to indeed change the electricity bill name to the tenant's name, so this issue would not even be possible. One suggestion to speedhome, maybe should highlight the importance of this to landlord, or you could even make this as part of the signup process?

Kudos to @wheimeng and speedhome team for the quick resolution.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0231sec    0.76    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 12:14 PM