A florist ârefusedâ to make bouquets for a gay wedding. So the town decided to end discrimination once and for allSource:
https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2020/07/26/alask...st-gay-wedding/
A
small Alaskan city has
unanimously voted for a new
law protecting LGBT+ people from discrimination after a local florist allegedly refused to make the wedding bouquets for a gay couple.
Ketchikan, population 8,289, is a seaside city on Alaskaâs southeastern coast popular with passing cruise ships.
Itâs known for its wildlife â which includes bears, wolves and eagles â and, as of July 16, for being the
fourth Alaskan city to pass sweeping non-discrimination law for its LGBT+ residents.The local law â which was passed unanimously, with
all seven of the city councilâs members in favour â came about after
a florist, Heavenly Creations, allegedly
refused to take an order for a same-sex wedding.
After a high-profile demonstration outside Heavenly Creations, the city-wide ordinance was proposed.
It follows in the wake of the US Supreme Courtâs historic ruling that made it
illegal to fire workers for being gay or transgender â and goes several steps further, by also banning
discrimination against LGBT+ people in housing or public businesses.Heather Dalin, the owner of Heavenly Creations,
denies discriminating against a same-sex couple.
âI have personally
made and delivered bouquets to the members of LBGTQ community on numerous occasions,â she said at a July 2 council meeting. âWe have not, and do not discriminate.â
But she went on to clarify that forcing her to make bouquets for LGBT+ weddings would
violate her own right to exercise her religious beliefs.âWhen it comes to the holy sacrament of marriage, Godâs word is clear,â she said, K Too reported.
âMarriage is one of the seven sacraments where the Lord Jesus Christ is present. For you to pass an unnecessary ordinance to try and force myself to participate in a ceremony that violates not only Godâs holy truth, but also strips me of my rights as an American tax-paying, law-abiding citizen is unreasonable.â
After hearing her objections, the Ketchikan
city council passed the new non-discrimination laws anyway.Museum curator Ryan McHale also testified at the meeting, arguing that
religion has long been used to justify discrimination.âMuch like their pro-slavery predecessors, segregationists during the Jim Crow era cited
scripture as justification for maintaining racial segregation and inequality,â McHale said.
âThere is little that distinguishes the religious freedom claim of today from those of the segregationists who argued that they should not be forced to hire, serve or associate with African Americans or Native Americans.â
The new law will
come into effect in mid-August, when Ketchikan will join the Alaskan cities of Sitka, Juneau and Anchorage in having laws to protect its LGBT+ residents.
Added on God, I hope the florist is going to be okay getting her business flooded with orders from LGBT people after this.

Honestly, I'm conflicted over this sort of law because it is politically charged. I believe that businesses should have the right to choose their customers every much as customers have the right to choose which business to spend their money on. In this case, the business is rejecting LGBT business, but would there be a similar outcry if the business rejects Neo-Nazis instead? I surely wouldn't want to force a business which rejects me for who I am, to serve me. I much rather give business to someone who actually respects me for who I am. Maybe that's because we live in cities where we have a lot of choices of businesses to patronise, though.