QUOTE(BillCollector @ Jan 23 2020, 01:50 AM)
1.) There are ways to do so, naturally many of them retire each year and easiest to just not replace them. It can be done over 3-10 years.
2.) You also seem to forget that with such a low tax regime it would spur plenty of economic growth and 80% of people pay no taxes at all in this country. If implemented properly that low tax rate probably will bring in more money than it does now.
3.) It has to be done in stages.
4.) A Bill of Rights is a good starting point.
5.) Any immigration policy will have its pros and cons. However it is better to have high value ones than those from less desirable 3rd world places.
6.) Are you sure on this?? Do you realize it cost equally as much if not more in wages to hire foreign labor? Again it has to be done in stages.
7.) There are fast growing trees and there is always bamboo as well. Having as much oil palms are essentially putting all eggs in 1 basket.
8.) My point is there won't be a national car program any longer. Rail and public transport would be the main stay of transportation and it should also be one of the main drivers of economic growth.
9.) Why??
1. JPA has already frozen hiring for years. Waiting for them to retire is not the solution. Luckily there ARE solutions, and they are being implemented.
2. Considering your pro-white bent, I am surprised that you are going for the low tax route. Them progressive white countries (Denmark, Belgium, Netherlands, Canada, Norway) have some pretty insane taxes, either in the form of VAT, income or corporate tax. But yeah, if we want to be a tax haven, there has to be some sort of incentive for them to do so, apart from just low tax. What ideas do you have?
3. I am not even going to address this due to cultural sensitivities, other law makers can handle it.
4. Considering (again) point #3, any Bill of Rights would be controversial at best, and impossible to implement at worst due to strong opposition.
5. It is doubtful that free visas for whites, Koreans, Japanese or Taiwanese would entice them to come here to bust our tables. High value is not a universal term that can be applied across the board. Businesses are not hiring 'less desirable 3rd worlders' just for fun ya know. There is a point to it.
6. Yes I am sure. Because if it costs equally, if not more to hire foreign labour, exactly WHY is it done? Is it because corporate bosses speak <3rd world language> better than English/BM?
7. No, palm should not be our only agricultural product. However, again there is a very good reason why it is in high demand. It is not like we grow them and then throw them into the sea or something.
8. No other country has a national car program. It may have been relevant 30 years ago, but not anymore. Due to our geographical location, another form of hightech heavy industry should replace it. Again luckily, it is slowly being implemented.
9. Oh sure, you can adopt things like IP law, aerospace and maritime standards, accounting/architectural/engineering standards etc. Or even stuff like Western Values, progressive ideology (democracy, meritocracy etc). But other things like trade policies, foreign policies, security etc? Hell no. Why? Because they give no shits about us. We are not even their neighbours, we have zero leverage on them. They have no incentive to have our best interest at heart, as their priorities are their OWN constituents first, meaning there will be a conflict of interest. A stronger SEA bloc would be the desired goal, not someone a million miles away. Just because the guys at the nicer neighbourhood have nicer houses does not mean that they should be parents to your children. If anything else, you should concentrate on making your own neighbourhood nicer for a start.