Norton is really RAM eater. Never tried it but I don't think its good. Even McAfee which eat quite amount of ram as well performs better than it..
Norton.....Ram eater?
|
|
 Jul 16 2007, 01:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
4,816 posts Joined: Apr 2007  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jul 16 2007, 02:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
4,816 posts Joined: Apr 2007
|
QUOTE(yewkhuay @ Jul 16 2007, 02:33 PM) how about bitdefender n kaspersky? Not sure about Bit Defender. For KasperSky, my friend used it and overall it's good. Just that he said that the Firewall is a little complicated compared with McAfee.. |
|
|
Jul 20 2007, 07:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
4,816 posts Joined: Apr 2007
|
QUOTE(super macgyver @ Jul 20 2007, 07:20 PM) McAfee is not user friendly, & like to left a lot gabage file inside hdd space & reg too. Not quite true. McAfee is quite user-friendly already. Last time where I recommend my other friends (New to pc stuff) to use it and most of them don't have much problem with it and get used to it real soon. |
|
|
Jul 20 2007, 07:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
4,816 posts Joined: Apr 2007
|
QUOTE(fylon @ Jul 20 2007, 07:31 PM) Well.. As for me, McAfee FTW. Haha.. Has been using this antivirus since i start use pc until now. Same. Last time when I was very noob and my friend introduced me this. Use McAfee until this year (well you know, no more xx-ed version.. not working = no money :/) and 'forced' to switch. For around 6 or 7yrs im using this antivirus. So far, nothing bad about it. Protect me well.But one thing im agree with super macgyver, this antivirus really left about of garbage file in hdd. But it ok for me, due im do clean up every few days!  |
| Change to: |  0.0147sec
 0.37
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 07:21 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.