Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Norton.....Ram eater?

views
     
TStooyipjee
post Jul 16 2007, 08:36 AM, updated 19y ago

New Member
*
Junior Member
47 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
My laptop takes bout 3-5 min to start up...issit cuz of de antivirus??.....pls advise...or should i change to another antivirus??...thx

Cheers....
xAmdx
post Jul 16 2007, 09:00 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
487 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


Mind to share what norton program u are using, Norton anti-virus, Internet security or 360?
adriankhoo153
post Jul 16 2007, 09:02 AM

So many star for what?
*******
Senior Member
4,808 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
My Norton 360 doesn't effect my start up time at all..
kakarocht
post Jul 16 2007, 09:12 AM

Hibernate Time.............
*******
Senior Member
3,254 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Tekken - Mishima Corps.
how big is your ram actually? hmm.gif
samurai1337
post Jul 16 2007, 09:59 AM

@_@
Group Icon
VIP
11,594 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Area 51

Moved from Windows Vista
coolmast3r
post Jul 16 2007, 10:21 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
740 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Langkawi



Well, from my previous experience, yes.. norton is such a RAM eater..
But that was 5-7 years ago when i last used them laugh.gif

I'm not sure about their product rite now..
I dont even use one..
Smackers
post Jul 16 2007, 10:40 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
657 posts

Joined: May 2005


Try turning off Automatic Live Update and "Run Quick Scan whenever updates have been received".

I'm using Norton Internet Security 2007 and ran into performance problems.CPU & Ram is constantly used up.After turning it off,i see dramatic decrease in cpu usage.
fiqir
post Jul 16 2007, 12:24 PM

BE YOURSELF
*******
Senior Member
3,810 posts

Joined: Jan 2006



everyone knew that norton are very sucks AV, so just change to the other lorr... icon_rolleyes.gif
yewkhuay
post Jul 16 2007, 01:39 PM

I don't even belong here....
*******
Senior Member
6,657 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
serious ? no wonder my laptop now load so slow ...
anthonyz
post Jul 16 2007, 01:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
178 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
Norton is good...but bad thing is that sux up a lot of RAM..so do change to others...there a alot of good one out there...
yewkhuay
post Jul 16 2007, 01:45 PM

I don't even belong here....
*******
Senior Member
6,657 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
no wonder my laptop hang easily now when i try open excel file n msn...
Zeroize
post Jul 16 2007, 01:48 PM

Hardcock Gamer
*****
Senior Member
895 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: -- Alor Star, Kedah -- -- Gelang Patah, Johor --



I work as a vendor for one factory, they just upgraded to NOD32 from norton a few months ago.

Reason? Norton itself can't even protect the server from virus invasion. And while remove the norton from client PC, many of them cannot be uninstalled. Have to use the removal tools to remove the program.

Don't use norton, it really sux. Till now, it still sux.
polarzbearz
post Jul 16 2007, 01:54 PM

Gracie
*******
Senior Member
4,816 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


Norton is really RAM eater. Never tried it but I don't think its good. Even McAfee which eat quite amount of ram as well performs better than it..
deric88
post Jul 16 2007, 02:29 PM

Spam Ranking
******
Senior Member
1,464 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
say no to norton,
the reason so many ppl using it is actually it was preloaded into the pcs and laptops......

yewkhuay
post Jul 16 2007, 02:33 PM

I don't even belong here....
*******
Senior Member
6,657 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
how about bitdefender n kaspersky?
outdoorxplorer
post Jul 16 2007, 02:35 PM

~Money Only Bring Pleasures When You Spent It WISELY!~
*******
Senior Member
2,028 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur, MYS


Norton360 seems to be working OK on my rig.


polarzbearz
post Jul 16 2007, 02:52 PM

Gracie
*******
Senior Member
4,816 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


QUOTE(yewkhuay @ Jul 16 2007, 02:33 PM)
how about bitdefender n kaspersky?
*
Not sure about Bit Defender. For KasperSky, my friend used it and overall it's good. Just that he said that the Firewall is a little complicated compared with McAfee..
goldfries
post Jul 16 2007, 02:58 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




i've avoided Norton since more than 5 years ago. those days you know la. around Celeron 400 - Duron 800 with 64mb RAM to 256mb RAM range and Windows 98/early XP. smile.gif

i'm satisfied with AVG and therefore not switching camp.
fiqir
post Jul 16 2007, 03:38 PM

BE YOURSELF
*******
Senior Member
3,810 posts

Joined: Jan 2006



QUOTE(Zeroize @ Jul 16 2007, 01:48 PM)
I work as a vendor for one factory, they just upgraded to NOD32 from norton a few months ago.

Reason? Norton itself can't even protect the server from virus invasion. And while remove the norton from client PC, many of them cannot be uninstalled. Have to use the removal tools to remove the program.

Don't use norton, it really sux. Till now, it still sux.
*
wow... their so change it earlier shocking.gif sweat.gif
abubin
post Jul 16 2007, 03:44 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,429 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



bitdefender sucks!! don't use it. They are being sold for RM49 or something right now to get people to buy them but they are ineffective in getting rid of malwares.

My friend's PC using bitdefender but got all sorts of virus problem. Then switched to avg, better but keep on prompting got virus and all but then switched to avira anti-vir. No more problems. Best of all avira is free.

But if you want good and stable antivirus, try nod32. It's quite effective (not 100%) but light on memory. Problem is, not so easy to learn how to use.
akachester
post Jul 16 2007, 04:48 PM

Its Life. Live with it!
*******
Senior Member
7,689 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: The Land of No Return


I tried using Norton in my system. Working fine until recently (Norton 2005 before)...

I used to think that Norton is a bad memory eater but to be honest, with 1GB of ram or more, it isnt really noticeable to me. But bad things happened when i tried to update to Norton 2007 (instead of Norton 360). To my surprise, Norton 2007 is not sucking my memory but my CPU speed. After installing the AV, my CPU speed/performance is at a constant 50% even on idle.

After thorough checking, i knew that it is the Norton that is causing the trouble. I uninstall it and keep on with my 2005.
TechnoDude94
post Jul 16 2007, 07:39 PM

Happiness Advocate
*******
Senior Member
6,738 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Eau Claire, Wisconsin


Hmm, I prefer AVG or McAfee to Norton because most of the Norton products suck RAM except the Norton 360 which sucks lesser RAM. Just my 2 cents.
fiqir
post Jul 16 2007, 07:41 PM

BE YOURSELF
*******
Senior Member
3,810 posts

Joined: Jan 2006



QUOTE(abubin @ Jul 16 2007, 03:44 PM)
bitdefender sucks!! don't use it. They are being sold for RM49 or something right now to get people to buy them but they are ineffective in getting rid of malwares.

My friend's PC using bitdefender but got all sorts of virus problem. Then switched to avg, better but keep on prompting got virus and all but then switched to avira anti-vir. No more problems. Best of all avira is free.

But if you want good and stable antivirus, try nod32. It's quite effective (not 100%) but light on memory. Problem is, not so easy to learn how to use.
*
got a lot free AV on the net... not need to waste ur money icon_rolleyes.gif
TStooyipjee
post Jul 16 2007, 09:40 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
47 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
ohh....well what antivirus is de best.....money i not a probelm....n FYI my ram is 1GB DDR2
coolmast3r
post Jul 17 2007, 08:03 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
740 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Langkawi



QUOTE(tooyipjee @ Jul 16 2007, 09:40 PM)
ohh....well what antivirus is de best.....money i not a probelm....n FYI my ram is 1GB DDR2
*
here has been a lot of discussion about that in LYN in the past..
just go find the right topic, whether u want paid or free AV..
all is there, in LYN.. thumbup.gif

please read those related forums and decide icon_rolleyes.gif
there some reason GOD gives us a brain for each of us.. nod.gif

This post has been edited by coolmast3r: Jul 17 2007, 08:07 AM
akachester
post Jul 17 2007, 08:40 AM

Its Life. Live with it!
*******
Senior Member
7,689 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: The Land of No Return


QUOTE(TechnoDude94 @ Jul 16 2007, 07:39 PM)
Hmm, I prefer AVG or McAfee to Norton because most of the Norton products suck RAM except the Norton 360 which sucks lesser RAM. Just my 2 cents.
*
Used AVG before - Gave up after that. Detect unnecessary problems, give away dangerous ones.

Used McAfee before - Gave up as well. Dont like it (for unknown reasons).


For now, i only like NOD32, AntiVir, Norton. These are the ones i trust as off now without giving me any trouble thus far except for Norton 2007.
adriankhoo153
post Jul 17 2007, 08:55 AM

So many star for what?
*******
Senior Member
4,808 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
I duno why everyone complaing bout Norton. Yeah, i know they are once known as a memory hunger in Norton Internet Security but that was over.. Have u guys actually tried Norton 360? It's not resource hog at all at least for me. i have nv encounter any slow down on start up as well as system work. it just work nicely.
fiqir
post Jul 17 2007, 09:08 AM

BE YOURSELF
*******
Senior Member
3,810 posts

Joined: Jan 2006



QUOTE(adriankhoo153 @ Jul 17 2007, 08:55 AM)
I duno why everyone complaing bout Norton. Yeah, i know they are once known as a memory hunger in Norton Internet Security but that was over.. Have u guys actually tried Norton 360? It's not resource hog at all at least for me. i have nv encounter any slow down on start up as well as system work. it just work nicely.
*
because norton had been the most sucks AV for many years laugh.gif icon_rolleyes.gif
Scud_eSpade
post Jul 17 2007, 10:24 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
345 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: B. B. Bangi


QUOTE(adriankhoo153 @ Jul 17 2007, 08:55 AM)
I duno why everyone complaing bout Norton. Yeah, i know they are once known as a memory hunger in Norton Internet Security but that was over.. Have u guys actually tried Norton 360? It's not resource hog at all at least for me. i have nv encounter any slow down on start up as well as system work. it just work nicely.
*
of course N360 is not resoucre hog.. (otherwise symantec is in big trouble)lack many important feature.. even newbie should not use it. i wonder why ppl still want to use N360. N360 is symantec answer after they failed to trim NAV in term of resource. What a nice piece of junk.
but i do agree that nowadays norton is not as resource hog as the old version
fiqir
post Jul 17 2007, 10:30 AM

BE YOURSELF
*******
Senior Member
3,810 posts

Joined: Jan 2006



QUOTE(Scud_eSpade @ Jul 17 2007, 10:24 AM)
of course N360 is not resoucre hog.. (otherwise symantec is in big trouble)lack many important feature.. even newbie should not use it. i wonder why ppl still want to use N360. N360 is symantec answer after they failed to trim NAV in term of resource. What a nice piece of junk.
but i do agree that nowadays norton is not as resource hog as the old version
*
their track record in AV field.. is very sucks laugh.gif sweat.gif
yewkhuay
post Jul 17 2007, 10:37 AM

I don't even belong here....
*******
Senior Member
6,657 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
waiting for my bitdefender v10+ to arrive...
Nidz
post Jul 19 2007, 01:56 PM

Don't Be Average!!
******
Senior Member
1,505 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Subang Jaya, Selangor


ive been using kaspersky since last year, never gimme a hard time since... very nice n powerful... notworthy.gif
TechnoDude94
post Jul 19 2007, 07:49 PM

Happiness Advocate
*******
Senior Member
6,738 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Eau Claire, Wisconsin


QUOTE(tooyipjee @ Jul 16 2007, 09:40 PM)
ohh....well what antivirus is de best.....money i not a probelm....n FYI my ram is 1GB DDR2
*
Bro, 1GB RAM also not enough la, if your running Windows Vista with Norton Internet Security 07 on and most of the startup items i.e. MSN, YM or Skype. Heck, 2GB ain't even enough.
super macgyver
post Jul 20 2007, 07:20 PM

★~13k Spam Club~★
********
All Stars
19,324 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



QUOTE(akachester @ Jul 17 2007, 08:40 AM)
Used AVG before - Gave up after that. Detect unnecessary problems, give away dangerous ones.

Used McAfee before - Gave up as well. Dont like it (for unknown reasons).
For now, i only like NOD32, AntiVir, Norton. These are the ones i trust as off now without giving me any trouble thus far except for Norton 2007.
*
McAfee is not user friendly, & like to left a lot gabage file inside hdd space & reg too. wink.gif
polarzbearz
post Jul 20 2007, 07:24 PM

Gracie
*******
Senior Member
4,816 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


QUOTE(super macgyver @ Jul 20 2007, 07:20 PM)
McAfee is not user friendly, & like to left a lot gabage file inside hdd space & reg too.  wink.gif
*
Not quite true. McAfee is quite user-friendly already. Last time where I recommend my other friends (New to pc stuff) to use it and most of them don't have much problem with it and get used to it real soon.
fylon
post Jul 20 2007, 07:31 PM

~ The Revival ~
*******
Senior Member
4,431 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Soviet Sarawak


Well.. As for me, McAfee FTW. Haha.. Has been using this antivirus since i start use pc until now. sweat.gif For around 6 or 7yrs im using this antivirus. So far, nothing bad about it. Protect me well.

But one thing im agree with super macgyver, this antivirus really left about of garbage file in hdd. But it ok for me, due im do clean up every few days! laugh.gif
polarzbearz
post Jul 20 2007, 07:34 PM

Gracie
*******
Senior Member
4,816 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


QUOTE(fylon @ Jul 20 2007, 07:31 PM)
Well.. As for me, McAfee FTW. Haha.. Has been using this antivirus since i start use pc until now. sweat.gif For around 6 or 7yrs im using this antivirus. So far, nothing bad about it. Protect me well.

But one thing im agree with super macgyver, this antivirus really left about of garbage file in hdd. But it ok for me, due im do clean up every few days! laugh.gif
*
Same. Last time when I was very noob and my friend introduced me this. Use McAfee until this year (well you know, no more xx-ed version.. not working = no money :/) and 'forced' to switch.
fiqir
post Jul 20 2007, 08:59 PM

BE YOURSELF
*******
Senior Member
3,810 posts

Joined: Jan 2006



QUOTE(fylon @ Jul 20 2007, 07:31 PM)
Well.. As for me, McAfee FTW. Haha.. Has been using this antivirus since i start use pc until now. sweat.gif For around 6 or 7yrs im using this antivirus. So far, nothing bad about it. Protect me well.

But one thing im agree with super macgyver, this antivirus really left about of garbage file in hdd. But it ok for me, due im do clean up every few days! laugh.gif
*
i think Mcfee used alot of RAM like norton sweat.gif
riku2replica
post Jul 23 2007, 10:13 AM

Mugi-chan!! 可愛い!!
*******
Senior Member
3,304 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Chicago(Port25)
norton = causing com slow while scanning(ram consuming and cpu % eater)
kaspersky = very sensetive when it comes to online gaming(so far seen a lot of warnings/alerts when playing maple story)
mcafee = used b4, but it's ok ok that type
bit defender = never tried b4
avast = friend is using, ok for moderate security...
antivir = that's what i'm using....
zone alarm pro = incompatible with my linksys router :swt:...
edan1979
post Jul 23 2007, 10:25 AM

*GruMpy_MoDe*
*******
Senior Member
5,517 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: On Earth.



2 words.... Norton Sucks...

no matter what... even the new version N360 is still suck...

my recommendation....

Nod32,Kaspersky,AVG,Avira

choose which one... this 4 antivirus never give me a problem...
fiqir
post Jul 23 2007, 10:36 AM

BE YOURSELF
*******
Senior Member
3,810 posts

Joined: Jan 2006



norton must shuts down their company, coz their product so sucks sweat.gif
super macgyver
post Jul 23 2007, 04:49 PM

★~13k Spam Club~★
********
All Stars
19,324 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



maybe they still can improve like last time, dun curse them like tis lah.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0200sec    1.45    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 10:33 AM