I beg to differ. The battery king in any benchmark/review is Moto G7 Power just because it has 720p display which is similar to iPhone 11's 800p.
Even the good battery on the iPhone 11 can't beat it.
Another thing to consider is the UI and software customization of Android OEMs.
There is a wrong perception that all Android phones are created equal.

Samsung has modified Android via One UI. Huawei also do it with their EMUI.
Nokia/Motorola both have clean Android One interface, where there is no customization whatsoever and only few additional apps here and there.

As for the difference in screen resolution, it is more objective as you compare numbers but people see it subjectively.
Android users are known to pixel peep a lot (because we know the difference among screen resolutions) whereas iPhone users don't really care to the point that some think an iPhone 11 has the same screen resolutions as its Pro counterparts.

It's difficult to answer when it comes to "signal strength" as this is hardware AND software related. Remember that different brands use different hardware/chips to build their phones.
One thing is for sure- when you have weak signal, it draws more battery.

Just think of it like you are downloading something on your phone 24/7 (since some apps require background data processing).
A weak signal will definitely have slower internet so it takes more time to use your mobile data hence, more power is needed to stay your phone "awake".

Anyway, I had the OG X, X2 and X4. The X4 for me has above average battery life if i can remember.
I don't think there is anymore Android phone that is similarly spec'd as the iPhone 11 (flagship SOC with low display resolution).
This is actually Apple's advantage because now, consumers think that iPhones have the best battery life due to the iPhone 11.

Somehow signal bar doesn't mean anything.. the actual reading rate would depend on signal strength.. as comparison I have took xiaomi 9 vs my Sony phone..

Both are in same mobile network, mobile plan and same location.. signal strength almost similar..
Somehow Xiaomi showing 4/5 bars while Sony showing 0/4 bar..

However, in screenshot it is showing little better signal strength in Sony log.. does it mean 80% good coverage in xiaomi and worst reception in Sony.. both did run speed test and show average 6mbps download and 10mbps upload speed.

it could be the signal at your area is seriously sucks...   

Telco issue.. Last year i changed to Maxis cause went to KL for few months.. Now im back to penang and find out my surrounding colleagues those using maxis/hotlink having inconsistent signal for Maxis.. Straight and changed back to my previous Telco, Celcom.. Now im good for Celcom line.. Celcom using Band 7 while Maxis band 3.. but midnight Maxis will connected to Band 7.

Band 7 which is stable and even though low bar/weak signal.. Celcom download and upload can maintain above 10mbps.. midnight celcom and maxis can get up to 141mbps download and 48 mbps upload..

So back to question, i would say mobile telco network did play an important role.. e.g. Celcom good for me doesnt mean good for everyone.. maybe you may try a prepaid sim for different telco and try out.. At least now im happy with Celcom network currently..

https://www.phonearena.com/news/samsung-gal...s-leak_id121744

Is it just my OCD or the new Galaxy S20 devices look ugly because they are not symmetrical. The back curves a lot more than the front.
When you view it from the side, the curvature on the top and bottom look aren't symmetrical either.

Just comparing it to how symmetrical in the S10 series (even Note 10) and all iPhones in general.
https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s10...ctures-9536.php

Believe it or not, the answer is yes. I have been using few generations of S and note series (Exynos), I also using OnePlus series (snapdragon) at the same time. And I can notice the  difference. Speed is one thing, another one is the smoothness! Snapdragon is much snappier than exynos.  You could say the speed difference is not that significant, but one thing is sure significant. The signal reception. Snapdragon is much better than exynos in term of signal reception. No need to argue. Just search through this thread and you will know how many note 10 users in here are suffered due to unstable signal reception recently.

And one more thing, do you guys wonder why note 10 lite is cheaper than S10 lite? Note 10 lite got the mighty S pen, which supposed to be superior compared to the S line, so why it's cheaper? The answer is simple. Because S10 lite is using much better chip. Samsung knows it, everyone know it. Even their mother land Korea already decided to use S20 snapdragon version. Tell me. Which manufacturer would ditch their own house chip and use other chip instead in their Homeland? So stop wondering anymore. Samsung snapdragon is indeed better than Samsung Exynos.

Don't get me wrong. I am not saying exynos is shit. As I said earlier, I myself have been using exynos phones all these years. I have no major issues with it. But at the same time, I also cannot deny the fact that there's a better version out there and we can only get it via import.

Bearable. Sometimes outdoor 4G is not stable. Either no signal or auto switched to 3G. Some times it does frustrate me. Other than that, no major issue. My first flagship was Samsung phone, and been using their series until now. So I already get used to this situation. But after I tried other snapdragon phones, even the mid range phone, the signal is much better and stable compared to my beloved Samsung phone. I actually did compare side by side, same location, same Telco. Yes. No matter it's flagship or low end phone, snapdragon is always better than exynos , in term of singal reception stability. This is also the major reason why snapdragon battery life is better then exynos. Stronger reception, larger battery saving, and longer stand by.

Most people may say they won't care. It's because we have no choice. If we want the local warranty, we can only stick to SME set which is exynos. If snapdragon local set is available, same price same warranty, who would still prefer exynos version? Of course everyone will jump to the better side.

Now I can only hope that Samsung will release snapdragon version S20 series in Malaysia (rumor). If not, then S10 lite is the only option if you prefer Samsung phone that came with better chip.

Well, you’re a far more patient person than me... I had it after just 3 weeks of ownership, bro. To see my midrange Redmi Note 7 run circles around my Note 10+ in terms of reception and signal strength was painfully embarrassing
Even with the Note 10 or 10+, I think most people would set the resolution to 1080p. In theory the processor of the Note 10+ should be more efficient, so it remains to be seen which has the better battery life, but I’m guessing it’ll be marginal whichever way it goes.

Anyone using this note 10 have network issue?

S20 ultra price is so high..lol

yea at least can choose for those who using.

true, else will let user use at higher then 1080p, after using note for some time now, i look at my old phone display and was like wow the difference hahaha

he is excited to show he bought lite la......

I dunno who you want me to promise to show? If you need mental help please consultant a doctor . We are not doctor. Hope you get well soon bro especially Corona virus is around

I am sorry cant help your condition . Hope my phone photo will cheers u up =) or use ky jelly

wah bro, why lower all the way to the lowest, got powerbank and also fast charging mahh hahahaha

Yea. Same here. Even p20 pro look small to me now hahaha.

Yeap. Samsung screen is one of the best
Ohhh, testing which resolution got best battery life ?

bro he take two year to reach 7 star (that exclude his previous BAN account), you ? 14 year and still 6 star ... understand la.

I m using it battery drain overnight only 7% , signal data seems better no more stop wait lag.

i think u will see improvement when u have long standby time
most ppl feel that the standby time for note is not good

16% to run 81 minutes of SOT is not that bad to be honest.