1) NanoG to kill germs so I wouldn't need to buy a separate air puirifier
2) Shower cooling is useful since I will be using 1 AC for a big space hence the coverage area is important
3) Price is more or less the same compared to its competitors (Mitsubishi, Daikin, York) even though Panasonic has way more bells and whistles.
Are those claims by Panasonic really true?
Nanoe G - It removes microorganism and dust particles as small as PM2.5 from the air.
Does the NanoG really work? Or would a standalone purifier work better?
Shower cooling - It has a sub flap and bigger flap with 2 independent motors for the 2 flaps. It supposedly helps to deliver airflow better.
But we can just set the flap in a certain direction in this case horizontally. And how can we tell this flap really does have a longer airflow? Is there a way to compare this with other AC's from the specs?
My living room and dining room and kitchen are more or less in one space. The AC will be on the main wall so that it can hit the living room and kitchen and lastly dining room on the smaller wall.
Therefore the aircon would need to cover a large area so it would be really great if this shower cooling works in concentrating a certain area and can have a more efficient airflow.
EcoNavi - it detects where energy is wasted and adjusts cooling power accordingly.
I mean it is cool but we can set the temperature and direction ourselves no? Not really necessary to me. But it is cool.
And with all these extra features; NanoG, EcoNavi), 2 motors for independent flaps, would there it be more prone to breakdown since there are more parts and sensors?
I was still 80% sure of Panasonic as I do think they would be useful if the claims are true.
However 2 shops that I went to recently said;
- Panasonic compressor is noisy. Mitsubishi is better as it is quieter and has a longer warranty of 7 years compared to 5 years Panasonic
- Panasonic has a high complain rate so they don't carry Panasonic anymore (could be an excuse to promote his other brands)
I don't mind Mitsubishi at all. It is in fact along with Daikin/York my 2nd option.
But is there any truth in the claims above?
I think the first one is the only claim that has any basis as the 2nd one could be just due to marketing.
I am looking at non inverter units btw since we only use aircon sparingly, 3-4 hours at night (timer) in the bedroom. In the living room, it would be really rare, perhaps when it is really hot during the day or when we have guests over.
I'm leaning 80%-20% to Mitsubishi now. 20% is to get the shower cooling feature for the living room only and the bedrooms go for a simple Mitsubishi. Shower cooling sounds really useful due to my layout.
Hope anyone can give any advice. Thanks
This post has been edited by barca96: Sep 27 2019, 01:58 PM
Attached thumbnail(s)
Sep 27 2019, 01:55 PM, updated 7y ago
Quote
0.0189sec
0.41
6 queries
GZIP Disabled