Hmm, considering the Logan is a pretty small car, i wonder will it be too much to actually have the Campro with CPS powering it. I mean, 98/99BHP for such a small car, won't it be a little, errr...dangerous?
clearer BLM pics!, side profile
clearer BLM pics!, side profile
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 12:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,386 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Many calls it "Hell" |
Hmm, considering the Logan is a pretty small car, i wonder will it be too much to actually have the Campro with CPS powering it. I mean, 98/99BHP for such a small car, won't it be a little, errr...dangerous?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 01:02 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,415 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: Malaysia |
I dont think so. Many small cars with big hp out there.
|
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 01:03 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
17,566 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: FFK Division - Klang |
QUOTE(@meno @ Jun 29 2007, 12:49 AM) Azuma-Kun, nice one there. no problem dude... Looks like it's gonna be based on the Logan platform after all. And the 1.3 Campro with CPS will be able to pull out more horsies than the standard 1.6 Logan engine. And it doesn't look that bad after all. Btw kcng, thanx for the facts. QUOTE(Azuma-kun @ Jun 29 2007, 12:49 AM) 100HP for a 1.3 CPS campro is indeed a posibility but to convert it all to the wheel is another issueQUOTE(travis_ckf @ Jun 29 2007, 12:54 AM) Although the campro 1.3 has more HP than typical 1.3 engines, i still doubt on why there underpower issues esp on the gen2 1.3. Could it be the mismatch of the gearbox? I know proton auto gearbox is a poor product frm mitsubishi. the gen2 1.3 is because of the gearbox mismatch......u try out the neo 1.3 manual and see QUOTE(@meno @ Jun 29 2007, 12:58 AM) Hmm, considering the Logan is a pretty small car, i wonder will it be too much to actually have the Campro with CPS powering it. I mean, 98/99BHP for such a small car, won't it be a little, errr...dangerous? nope, its the driver that will make the car dangerous....Added on June 29, 2007, 1:06 amAs promised, campro 1.3 dyno chart ![]() i will get the myvi chart up tomorrow cuz my fren is asleep now.... call him, he din pick up This post has been edited by kcng: Jun 29 2007, 01:06 AM |
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 01:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,386 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Many calls it "Hell" |
-Edited: double post-
Screw TMnut Scremyx This post has been edited by @meno: Jun 29 2007, 01:39 AM |
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 01:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
17,566 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: FFK Division - Klang |
QUOTE(@meno @ Jun 29 2007, 01:10 AM) Hmm, considering the Logan is a pretty small car, i wonder will it be too much to actually have the Campro with CPS powering it. I mean, 98/99BHP for such a small car, won't it be a little, errr...dangerous? loldouble post anyway, suzuki swift is quite small too but its 1.5 VVT engine is able to push out 100++ HP..... so, no it wont be dangerous but again the driver will make it dangerous |
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 01:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,386 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Many calls it "Hell" |
QUOTE(kcng @ Jun 29 2007, 01:12 AM) lol Ok, screw TMNut Screamyx...Will edit the double post...double post anyway, suzuki swift is quite small too but its 1.5 VVT engine is able to push out 100++ HP..... so, no it wont be dangerous but again the driver will make it dangerous Hmm, i agree too that it depends on driver's driving style. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 03:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,745 posts Joined: May 2007 From: KEPONG |
how about kancil turbo with 83hp? i try to ask my fren post the dyno chart..
but my fren drive his car +-80km/h, so slow~~~ |
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 07:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
17,566 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: FFK Division - Klang |
|
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 07:56 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,844 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: West Coast |
looking at the 1st photo, i have an impression that the rear seats legroom are going to be quite tight...
|
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 09:50 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,115 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Petaling Jaya |
The doors are definitely carry-overs from the Savvy but I don't see any other similarities... Hope it looks good...
|
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 10:59 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
547 posts Joined: May 2006 From: Bumi Bertuah |
ehh..sorry2..i juz came back from other planet..is BLM new product by PROTON?? never heard pun
Added on June 29, 2007, 11:02 amaduii..with this look,even wif 4 disc break with price 50-60 rather to buy myvi.. This post has been edited by bravobronzo: Jun 29 2007, 11:02 AM |
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 07:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
784 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Gombak | Taiping @ Looking Through |
|
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 07:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
17,566 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: FFK Division - Klang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 09:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,221 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
lets compare the diffs........
|
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 10:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
383 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Land of Traffic Jam, Subang Jaya |
where is the dyno chart for the myvi. i cant wait to see the 'powerfulness' of DVVT.
Anyway the campro is really a powerful engine. Even with a normal no valve variable mechanism its able to output so much power with the CPS i think that campro could be the one of the best engine out there. And also the torque problem will be fixed |
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 11:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,010 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: soviet sarawak, borneo. |
![]() captured by sonic cd now u can see the rear boot.. it looks better than the 1st post. |
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 11:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,415 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: Malaysia |
Nah....sebijik like Logan
|
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 11:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,714 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Taman Pekaka, Sg. Dua, Gelugor, Penang |
I'm sure that this car would be a hit, its a city/vios wannabe with cheaper price tag and affordable parts.Furthermore as a new model i'm sure they'll be some hyped up marketing effort with discounts,freebies and etc.
They way things are,proton is not in a damn bad shape after all. |
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 11:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,010 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: soviet sarawak, borneo. |
![]() ![]() compare the bodyline... the back part is totally different... if you compare it with my previous post. ![]() |
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 11:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,415 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: Malaysia |
But i really sure the rear light will be same.
|
| Change to: | 0.0190sec
0.52
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 10:47 PM |