QUOTE(kmarc @ Dec 16 2008, 11:38 AM)
I understand. That's why I asked the question. If a stock has more room for capital appreciation and projected to give good dividends, why not go for those stocks rather than REITS? Of course, good dividend stocks are usually defensive and doesn't appreciate much, right?
As I understand it, REITS will give good distribution but like stocks, the dividends might not be that high, looking at current markets.
I just want to understand this part. If REITS has it's extra advantages, I want to get some too!

Just an example:
UCHITEC - current price 0.97. Target price RM2.00. Projected dividend FY09 - around 15%!

(Tomato sauce : BNPP securities - market trends (Dec 2008))
For normal stock, business needs to make a profit to pay you the dividend, so no profit, no dividend or can't sustain the dividend.
For reit, as long as there is tenant and rental, then you know the distribution is there.
For normal stock, company can go burst and become zero.
For reit, whatever, you still have the property left.
Actually can't compare directly between both as risk involved and nature of business/company is totally different.
It is more like compared apple and orange.