That is what statistics over the history has shown us but Bobby has his own line of thoughts.

I believed he somewhat counters the argument with utility against depreciation - his assumption is that a car when bought generally enables you to earn income whereas a house just sits there and does nothing UNTIL you sell it and provided that it could be sold for the market price.

You spent most of the time using the car that enables you to generate income and you only use a small fraction of your time in a day utilizing the house which doesn't do anything for you therefore what you have is book value but you do not actually enjoy that "gain" in tangible forms.

At least that's what he proposes.

Yeah, it was twisted in a way.

I enjoyed his car reviews because they were raw in the sense that he says what he sees things to be - no fancy daisy stuffs but i have to admit, he has since veered off quite a bit especially when he begins creating so much segments,

Autobuzz now seems to have a more elaborate and concise manner in delivering information.