QUOTE(HalseyFrangipane @ May 7 2019, 04:33 PM)
People complaining about dark rear tints being dangerous, you obviously don't know that you're already suppose to keep a safe distance between you and the car in front IN ANTICIPATION of any unexpected emergencies. So if you rear-end the car in front of you and your excuse was that you couldn't see what's in front of the car ahead of you due to his dark tint, it means you're already too close to the car in front.
QUOTE(Mattrock @ May 7 2019, 04:55 PM)
Irresponsible populist move.
With the view from the rear view mirror completely gone, brace for more people suddenly coming into lane or bumping into your car. The rear view mirror gives much broader indication of what is going on behind. Side mirror has its own use, but will not replace the rear view mirror completely.
Also, babies or kids left in the back seat by an irresponsible parents will not be visible anymore. This new ruling will encourage more people to do this. Also, in case the kids in trouble or need help, no one will see.
your point is valid. but remember there are side mirrors for you to useWith the view from the rear view mirror completely gone, brace for more people suddenly coming into lane or bumping into your car. The rear view mirror gives much broader indication of what is going on behind. Side mirror has its own use, but will not replace the rear view mirror completely.
Also, babies or kids left in the back seat by an irresponsible parents will not be visible anymore. This new ruling will encourage more people to do this. Also, in case the kids in trouble or need help, no one will see.
using that logic those lorries and buses are way more dangerous since they dont have rear mirror
btw past cases on that negligence case
noticed how DARK the windows are?



QUOTE(andyng38 @ May 7 2019, 05:26 PM)
All my vehicles have no additional tinting. Sometimes I wonder why people want to have their car so dark...must be hard to drive in low-light conditions...wonder if they tint the rear view mirrors too.
And I've seen many cars with very special bubble-wrap tinting in their rear windscreen
BTW do u accept vids of bad drivers for yr utube channel?
fuyoh. then u must be living in cameron highland . or u never drive around KL at 12PMAnd I've seen many cars with very special bubble-wrap tinting in their rear windscreen
BTW do u accept vids of bad drivers for yr utube channel?
i cannot stand the 10am punya sunshine. really eating my skin alive.
QUOTE(Mel2 @ May 7 2019, 05:40 PM)
I support this new ruling..
If both rear windows and rear windscreen are blocked, I guess it's "safer" if you leave your bags at the back of your car. Not easy to see if just the front passenger and driver side windows are allowed 50%VLT.
Also, those bag snatching rempits who ride motor from the back can't see how many occupants in the car. They usually target single lady drivers.
No need to pay anything unless you want your whole car 100%VLT.
Those of you not used to have a darkened rear windscreen don't have to tint it. It's up to you.
ah mel, these jokers never think how women's girl kana hijack at the junction, pump station, etcIf both rear windows and rear windscreen are blocked, I guess it's "safer" if you leave your bags at the back of your car. Not easy to see if just the front passenger and driver side windows are allowed 50%VLT.
Also, those bag snatching rempits who ride motor from the back can't see how many occupants in the car. They usually target single lady drivers.
No need to pay anything unless you want your whole car 100%VLT.
Those of you not used to have a darkened rear windscreen don't have to tint it. It's up to you.
that's why I said, dark tint+safety tint is a must
This post has been edited by JimbeamofNRT: May 7 2019, 06:50 PM
May 7 2019, 06:49 PM

Quote
0.0243sec
2.02
6 queries
GZIP Disabled