QUOTE(lightning96 @ Aug 28 2007, 04:30 PM)
Lightning69 not here to provoke anyone. He is simply here to discuss PS3 issues...good or bad. But whenever he post a negative news about the PS3 it appears that many people here got very unhappy....resulting in him being the "bad guy" here. And BTW any negative things about the PS3 that he posted here is not created by him but news that he got from all over the net.
So far it appear that many forum members here are so narrow minded and immature when it comes to PS3 issues. At least lightning69 is is honest about how he feels about the PS3....ie. lack of good games, poor performance when compare to the 360, expensive etc.
Think of him as a true opposition member in the malaysian parliament where the rest of the MPs are only "yes" man who has no guts & balls to fight for what he truely believe. So he is simply arrested under ISA now

Sorry for the long post...Suddenly I feel the urge to post a very long long one...Hi,
I agree with you. What ever he did or post about PS3 in general is his god given right. I would very much fight for him to exercise his right to post here regarding PS3 news. And to add, I never said he should be banned or it's good that he's banned. I was surprised because the internet supposed to be a place where we can say anything we want (figuratively speaking).
I myself enjoys very much during the early days of 'debating' with him regarding PS3 issues. I believe in the end we (or maybe only me) agree to disagree. After a long while I don't really read his post since I've somehow have the impression that he likes to 'provoke' many of the PS3 owners here and he don't really want a meaningful debate. And since there are no way for me to get him not to do it anymore...I decided to ignore him altogether.
What is so wrong with these people being unhappy with the news...? If I hear say 100 people in Japan died in a big earthquake...and it makes me sad....Is it wrong...Or maybe another news that the US bombed a house in Iraq and 70 civilian died...and I got really mad...Is it wrong?
And for example...of course I'm mad because EA was too lazy to code a proper PS3 game till the framerate is capped a 30fps...it gave PS3 a bad name...simply because they are being lazy...is that wrong?
What wrong is when people totally ditch the fact that these devs are lazy and just simply said the PS3 is 'teh shit'. Who's the narrow minded person now. The person who thinks that 'maybe the devs are lazy' or the person who thinks that the ps3 is 'teh shit' without even considering that the devs or maybe even Sony SDK is not good enough for devs may play a part in it. To me I'm open to everything but please do some homework rather than just simply copy and paste then said A is bad and B is Good.
Also, what makes you said the people here are immature and etc? And what makes you think Lightning is honest and the others are not? are you like me....judging people by it's covers...?
And why do you think that others is not honest when they said PS3 performance is comparable to 360? or that it is not expensive? you've got no evidence to say that the rest are not honest or at least "as honest as" lightning69. They believe in their stand as much as Lightning believed it his and they are honest about it....you wouldn't know unless you can read their mind. And please prove that these people (myself included) are dishonest or at the very least not 'as honest as' Lightning69.
And lastly...I think that your analogy of the whole situation akin to Malaysia Parliament is totally retarded. I could simply said otherwise...i could just said that he just another 'yes man' who has no guts and balls and d*** and just 'kow tow' those who is anti-ps3 or to those who felt cheated into buying a PS3 or to those who still feel the need to validate that buying a ps3 was the right choice...
The rest is just the same...fighting for what they believe...what if they believe that PS3 is comparable to 360...or if they really really believe that a PS3 not expensive? It's what they believe...You can't say Lightning69 got balls if he believes in himself but then when others also believe in themselves you said they've got no balls...
If you want please give a better analogy and personally, I find that the bloggers around the country are a much better opposition that the one we have in the parliament.
It's a pity that he has been banned....That is why I wanted to know why he's banned? what is the reason...Even though a lot of member heres don't like him..he has every right to be here and also post here. Unless he's against the rules or something...and if he did go against the rules...then what can we do....but if he's not against any rules...then it's another ISA case...which of course I will not agree to.
Sorry for the long post...Suddenly I feel the urge to post a very long long one...