He likes nature.
So movies that shows nature destroyed or too much machine triggers him.
If he watch Transformers, confirm suicide.

his cartoon nothing la.

keep skin please

Look at you.

If this is how a fan behaves, then it means his cartoon failed.

Keep skin please.

^ Not mentioned in the article?

And please lah. Just because Trump has fixated on a wall, doesn't mean all walls throughout the history of man and literature are now tainted by association have some fricking perspective
So what
He still no balls to address the issue what

If he hold his own people to the same ideal as he holds Americans, he should be "anti sushi, anti Sony, anti Toyota, anti macha" because all these things represent the rape of Nanking

Boycott all those lah kalo berani

exactly

he's just being anti-American and hiding behind herp derp peace love hypocrisy

p.s. anti Fanta too aka Nazi Coke

Oh sorry, sarcasm meter rosak

Well at least as someone pointed out above, his anti-war stance is universal. And he advocates traditional Japanese cultural values instead of capitalism and consumerism (the subject of Spirited Away). I can agree with that.

But I have little regard for films like Grave of fireflies. They always tell the story of "oooo kesian jepunis kena whack kaw2 by evil A-bombing Americunts" and you can see by HM's comments that this is indeed his message. Conveniently overlooking the horror and misery that the Japanese themselves inflicted on others. It's self-serving self-pitying hypocritical crap. Till today I'm waiting for a Japanese-made film about what THEY did to others during WW2. Why not make a movie about that, eh?

The anti-Americanism is in his comments and personal outlook, read OP

Anyway, if he thinks hurr durr all war/fighting films are bad, what about... jeng jeng jeng

Porco Rosso is one of the few films directed by Hayao Miyazaki in which the historical and geographical settings are clearly defined and where most of the story could have happened in the real world. Marco is an Italian hero from the First World War and is shown fighting against Austro-Hungarian fighter planes in a flashback sequence. The story is set in the Adriatic Sea east coast between Dalmatian and Kvarner islands, a fictionalized city of Fiume after its annexation to fascist Italy and Northern Italy.

Porco makes statements of his being anti-fascist, quipping during one scene that "I'd much rather be a pig than a fascist". Miyazaki shed light on the political context of the making of the film in an interview with Empire. He reflects that the conflicts that broke out during the film's production (such as those in Dubrovnik and elsewhere) made Porco Rosso a much more complicated and difficult film.[9]

Evident historical and political realism aside, at least one scholar has argued that the film's more overt historical references can be understood as representative of wakon yosai (Japanese spirit; Western techniques)—a tendency, since the Meji period, for Japanese artists to paint Europe as spectacular, while simultaneously maintaining the distance necessary to preserve a distinct sense of Japanese identity. "In Porco Rosso", states academic Chris Wood, "Europe is tamed, rendered as a charming site of pleasurable consumption, made distant and viewed through a tourist gaze."[10]

offtopic sikit: I would go further than that actually

If you look at most American WW2 media, they mainly focus on just 4 battles - 1) Pearl Harbour, naturally; 2) Normandy D-day and French campaign, the first American-led victory in Europe; 3) Battle of the Bulge 1944, only the American half and only the victorious part; and 4) Pacific campaign, again only the American and victorious part in from island-hopping onwards

so this observation is not without merit

but again, you have to read OP which it looks like until now you still haven't, to get where my critique of HM is coming from

HM shit on LOTR because he said it glorifies war. Well, LOTR is a story of good guys forced to go to war against bad guys, to save the world. The main themes are friendship, sacrifice, and ultimately upholding righteous moral principles such as mercy despite seemingly being against practical considerations. It's not what he claims at all.

If even this level of conflict he considers "glorifying war", then hell, he himself shouldn't be doing anything like Porco Rosso or even the brief fighting in Howl's Moving Castle

which is why he is a hypocrite.

“If someone is the enemy, it’s okay to kill endless numbers of them,” he continued. “Lord of the Rings is like that. If it’s the enemy, there’s killing without separation between civilians and soldiers. That falls within collateral damage. How many people are being killed in attacks in Afghanistan? The Lord of the Rings is a movie that has no problem doing that [not separating civilians from enemies, apparently]. If you read the original work, you’ll understand, but in reality, the ones who were being killed are Asians and Africans. Those who don’t know that, yet say they love fantasy are idiots.”

A lot has happened in the past 32 years, and Miyazaki has obviously either changed his stance since then or has come to terms with how things are and has learned to go with the flow. Hearing accounts of how stubborn Miyazaki could be as a director, I doubt he would have let Studio Ghibli embrace Disney as it has if he still felt that way. Of course, while Miyazaki does own a car, it’s a Citroen C4. A French automobile...