QUOTE(axtray @ Mar 21 2019, 12:05 AM)
Not exactly the same. There's alot of difference in treating early detected cancer as compared to trying to treat it when it's already at stage 4 etc.
Same goes with the car. If you open the intake manifold and can see the carbon buildup is already there, why not do something about it? No one is stupid enough to do it and waste $$ if it's still clean.
If you have the spare cash to totally overhaul it, by all means do it. Walnut blasting is just the cheaper alternative that works. Your example on the blasting made it sound like it is totally abrasive when the walnut shells are pretty soft. If some of the grains do somehow managed to get into the cylinder, the combustion will just burn them out. Big difference to sand blasting. Also, If the valves are closed and the walnut still somehow managed to find its way in, then something is really wrong with the engine already.
I still find it weird on why you are so edgy about this.
To those who don't know the process,
"This blasting tool is using pressurised air (usually 6-8 bar) to inject fine walnut shell granules into the intake tract. These granules hit the carbonising at high speed and thus remove it entirely, while at the same time this material is soft enough not to damage the metal of the intake tract and the valves. That is also the reason why no other material should be used for this method."
I'm not sure how you get the idea that inside the cylinder is like a wood stove or some magical field keeping walnut shells floating about until combustion
mate, the cylinder is an oily place inside , either from engine oil or the petrol , whatever got in is going to stick like.glue to the oily surfaces especially the finest ones , so now you have this lovely coated walls with fine abrasives just waiting for the piston come and drag them along the walls up and down over and over.
doesn't that sound a lot like honing cylinder walls ?
QUOTE(6UE5T @ Mar 21 2019, 12:13 AM)
Seems like you never owned or saw carbon build up in a traditional GDi engine in front of your own eyes. To answer your question, no the engine is still not buggered and no it's not s crap beater car either. 😁
No, not same concept. You do chemo because you already feel sick, which is exactly like you imply! Who do chemo without already feeling pain first from the cancer?? 😂 If still small tumor then cut it out la before it gets worse until you need chemo.
Anyway nevermind, no point prolonging the debate. Obviously you think that method is difficult and risky while I think it's not so complicated as you think. I personally haven't done it too but I've done similar method just using more traditional manual tools because back then haven't know anyone yet that does this walnut blast method. In the future when comes time I would do that method, easier and faster.
exactly the symptom
' I HEARD is soft '
' I have haven't done it before too '
before you all so support it , why not present the risks involve and why should someone not do it and understand what the proper way of doing it entails
not just plainly support it without really having tested it themselves before
so far only one post who said it did help but it was already. last resort to a bad running car , what else could.be worse than to try .
I don't care what marketing wank these so called experts provide , either you remove the head, use traditional solvent nd elbow grease or use dry ice , co2 blasting method to clean , or like every other industry standard the part is blasted away from work area , put into parts washer then reinstalled
blowing abrasives all over your engine is the right way to break everything which is not broken
again is yr money, your engine , if you feel overwhelming need to support them , go ahead. I just want those who want to know more to just stop and think ' oh yeah hor, really need or not'.
This post has been edited by rcracer: Mar 21 2019, 09:09 AM