I find it strange that Malaysia media kiasu kiasi dont dare to report SG had invested billions of RM in Johor-owned Lingui dam which was handed over in 2011, upon expiry of 1st H2O agreemwent.

Any views?

87 we opt not to renew = we forever no need review? That's more than 30 years ago. And the agreement is 50 years ago.
Morality? No

SG selling water back to MY? Good business eh? getting 234 mgd of raw water for free and MY need to pay rm 500 more. The cost of treating water is higher than what SG is selling us? Believe me, we can also treat water in Malaysia at 1/3 the cost of SG.

SG spend billion for water facilities in Johor at the same time getting side contract with petronas?  Also who is paying maintainance fees after the facilities is handed to us?

Tun isn't going to live forever, but the water deal will   and an agreement without exit clause, without price increments/adjustment due inflation, without clause to renegotiate, is it still applicable in today's agreement standard? Is it morally right? What so if one of the direct party is not happy with the agreement.

Don't misunderstand what I mean, we aren't asking for things which aren't us, we are just asking for things which we deserves.

Let say you're the landlord, are you going to rent the room at 5 myr for 10 years? 20 years? 50 years? You know it's impossible right? We arent asking for 1 dollar, just 14 cent myr and you admit that SG can very well afford it.

I think we should put a stop on SG leeching on MY resources to make themselves wealthier. From manpower, raw resources to controlling Malacca Strait.

1987 is 30 years ago, who's paying the maintainance for the plant? Also we didn't charge SG the cost of treated water since they help with water treatment plant. We are selling as raw waters for 30 years since 87 no?